Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #4663
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: literals for an int128 class |
| Date | 2011-05-04 21:15 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <92cjpeFj03U17@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <8ec2c079-9c65-462a-a4b2-af8f2f0422ce@p7g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <ad75ebc6-5f03-4f1b-aa58-2e59d6cfc1ca@r20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
On 05/ 4/11 08:38 PM, Michael Doubez wrote:
> On 3 mai, 22:39, cps<chrissus...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am considering writing an int128 class as a programming exercise.
>> Before I start (and I have a fair idea of how to do it) I was
>> wondering what I can do about literals and the assignment operator. I
>> would like to be able to use integer literals with the assignment and
>> other operators with literals that are sized at 128 bits.
>>
>> E.g. I'd like to be able to do:
>>
>> uint128 myInt128 = 184467440737095516160;
>>
>> Note that the foregoing literal would produce an error (correctly
>> so) if I attempted to assign it to an uint64 because it is (2^64) *
>> 10.
>>
>> Is there any way I can set it up to deal with large literals?
>>
>> Or am I going to have to use strings and parse them?
>
> Parsing it from string is however a good idea.
>
> With C++0x, you will be able to write:
>
> uint128 operator "" ulll(const char * string_values, size_t
> num_chars)
> {
> return uint128::parse(string_values,num_chars);
> }
>
> uint128 myInt128 = 184467440737095516160ulll;
Neat. In which section of the standard is this described?
--
Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
literals for an int128 class cps <chrissusie8@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 13:39 -0700
Re: literals for an int128 class Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-05-03 16:51 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-04 08:53 +1200
Re: literals for an int128 class Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-03 17:17 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-04 01:38 -0700
Re: literals for an int128 class Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-04 21:15 +1200
Re: literals for an int128 class Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-06 01:03 -0700
Re: literals for an int128 class Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-06 08:00 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-05-06 09:30 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-06 08:00 -0700
csiph-web