Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #4639
| From | Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> |
|---|---|
| Organization | Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Date | 2011-05-03 17:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2011050317171672135-pete@versatilecodingcom> (permalink) |
| References | <8ec2c079-9c65-462a-a4b2-af8f2f0422ce@p7g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| Subject | Re: literals for an int128 class |
On 2011-05-03 16:39:35 -0400, cps said:
> I am considering writing an int128 class as a programming exercise.
> Before I start (and I have a fair idea of how to do it) I was
> wondering what I can do about literals and the assignment operator. I
> would like to be able to use integer literals with the assignment and
> other operators with literals that are sized at 128 bits.
>
> E.g. I'd like to be able to do:
>
> uint128 myInt128 = 184467440737095516160;
>
>
> Note that the foregoing literal would produce an error (correctly
> so) if I attempted to assign it to an uint64 because it is (2^64) *
> 10.
>
> Is there any way I can set it up to deal with large literals?
>
> Or am I going to have to use strings and parse them?
You can't do 128 bit literals if your compiler doesn't support them,
but you can do something that's a little easier than parsing a string.
struct uint128 {
uint128(unsigned long long word1, unsigned long long word0);
};
uint128 i0(0x21, 0x03);
uint128 i1(0x0, 3);
--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
literals for an int128 class cps <chrissusie8@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 13:39 -0700
Re: literals for an int128 class Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-05-03 16:51 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-04 08:53 +1200
Re: literals for an int128 class Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-03 17:17 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-04 01:38 -0700
Re: literals for an int128 class Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-04 21:15 +1200
Re: literals for an int128 class Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-06 01:03 -0700
Re: literals for an int128 class Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-06 08:00 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Victor Bazarov <v.bazarov@comcast.invalid> - 2011-05-06 09:30 -0400
Re: literals for an int128 class Michael Doubez <michael.doubez@free.fr> - 2011-05-06 08:00 -0700
csiph-web