Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #558759
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." |
| Date | 2016-03-03 00:57 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <8oekqc-ijp.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d0860bc5-141f-425c-88ec-b905ef83f296@googlegroups.com> |
Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> James, in the scientific literature, "water vapour" is understood to >> >> mean water (H2O) gas. >> > >> > I'm not saying many people don't believe that. I'm just saying that >> > nobody has any proof. >> >> It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition. > > My point exactly!!! The only point you have made is that you understand neither the English language nor science. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:19 -0800
Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:57 +0000
Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:01 -0800
Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 05:20 +0000
csiph-web