Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition."

From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition."
Date	2016-03-03 05:20 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<e6ukqc-j6r.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<d0860bc5-141f-425c-88ec-b905ef83f296@googlegroups.com> <8oekqc-ijp.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <f57e8e00-94c0-4117-97cb-32a922caccce@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 5:01:23 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>    James, in the scientific literature, "water vapour" is understood to
>> >> >>    mean water (H2O) gas. 
>> >> > 
>> >> > I'm not saying many people don't believe that.  I'm just saying that
>> >> > nobody has any proof.
>> >> 
>> >> It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition.
>> > 
>> > My point exactly!!!
>> 
>> The only point you have made is that you understand neither the English
>> language nor science.
> 
> Uh, I realize that truth isn't determined by semantics, you imbecile.

Then why do you keep insisting that your arm waving semantics prove
something, kook?


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:19 -0800
  Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 00:57 +0000
    Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 20:01 -0800
      Re: Jim Pennino: "It has nothing to do with proof, it is a definition." jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-03 05:20 +0000

csiph-web