Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #46986

Re: Hey DildoRider...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:i1mmcbpq12u6il6l1f3g0tbqnh1l2rte57@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

alt.free.newsservers and sci.physics desnecked, Spankard.

Afraid others will realize you're a moron? LOL

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
>> equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
>> a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
>> that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*);

> So, if the fourier transform of a circle is a sine wave,
> then the fourier transform of a triangle must be...
> 
> A TRIANGLE WAVE!!!  <ta-dum!>
> 
> We know you're an expertician on triangle waves, fakey.

No, the Fourier transform of the triangle function is the sinc
function squared. Don't you know anything? LOL

<http://www.thefouriertransform.com/pairs/triangle.php>

>>> In order to graph a complex function in time, you need a 3
>>> (three) dimension plot.

>> You'll be getting right on detailing what, exactly, you're plotting in
>> that third dimension to juxtapose it against voltage on the Y axis and
>> time on the X axis when plotting voltage vs. time for sinewaves, Shiny
>> Tinfoil Brain.

> I already told you, dimbulb.
> 
> You don't understand what complex numbers are, do you?

Sure I do. In fact, I've already demonstrated that fact by properly
graphing the 170 volt peak of each hot leg, graphed along with 
the 120.208 volt RMS L-N first-resultants and the 208.207 volt RMS L-L 
second-resultants, coincidentally color-coordinated to show the 
resultant phase shift due to superposition, completely in agreement 
with the phasor diagram:

<http://www.du.edu/~jcalvert/tech/wyedelta.gif>
<http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>

Input #1, Graph #1 (red): 170v peak, hot leg #1, 0 degree phase
Input #2, Graph #2 (green): 170v peak, hot leg #2, 120 degree phase
Input #3, Graph #3 (purple): 170v peak, hot leg #3, 240 degree phase

1st Resultant #1, Graph #4 (red): 120.208 volt RMS L1-N
1st Resultant #2, Graph #5 (green): 120.208 volt RMS L2-N
1st Resultant #3, Graph #6: (purple): 120.208 volt RMS L3-N
2nd Resultant #1, Graph #7: (red): 208.207 volt RMS L1-L2
2nd Resultant #2, Graph #8: (green): 208.207 volt RMS L2-L3
2nd Resultant #3, Graph #9: (purple): 208.207 volt RMS L3-L1

The 170 volt peak hot legs are the inputs, which result in the 120.208
volt RMS L-N first-resultants as graphed, which result in the 208.207
volt RMS L-L second-resultants as graphed.

The voltage of the 120.208 volt RMS L-N first-resultant is Peak
Voltage / SQRT(2):
170 / 120.208 = 1.41421
170 / SQRT(2) = 120.208
SQRT(2) = 1.41421

The voltage of the 208.207 volt RMS L-L second-resultant is SQRT(3) *
First Resultant:
208.207 / 120.208 = 1.73205
120.208 * SQRT(3) = 208.20636
SQRT(3) = 1.73205

SPNAK!

Now you k'lame the graph is wrong (again) so you can demonstrate
you're a know-nothing moron (again).

<snicker>

> Do i have to start charging you tuition?

Says the moron who's been wrong about nearly everything. LOL

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; and the moron continues to
demonstrate his inability to read a graph.

<http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>

SPNAK!

Do I have to start charging you tuition?

<snicker>

> -- 
> "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
>   --Fakey

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>

Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
=========================================================
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

<http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to 
Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
"Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups, 
which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as 
groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier 
transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT, 
group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier* 
*transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval 
with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle 
periodic functions."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of 
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."

Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't 
it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"Relation with complex exponentials:
The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's 
Formula"

Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak 
3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS 
L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.

<http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>

SPNAK!
=========================================================

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
are.

Spankard. Moron. LOL

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-21 07:20 +0100
  Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 15:50 +0800
    Re: Hey DildoRider... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-21 08:04 +0000
    Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 05:49 +0100
      Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:30 +0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 20:55 +0100
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 07:48 +0100
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-22 23:16 -0800
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 19:10 +0100
                Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 11:55 -0700
                Re: Hey DildoRider... Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-02-23 10:56 -0800
                Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 16:25 -0800
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 22:50 +0100
      Re: Hey DildoRider... Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:42 +0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 00:52 -0800
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 09:02 -0700
            Re: Hey DildoRider... "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 09:30 -0800
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 10:39 -0700
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:35 +0100
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
          Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 08:20 +0100
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-23 23:05 +0100
              Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-23 15:34 -0700
                Re: Hey DildoRider... "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 19:38 -0500
                Re: Hey DildoRider... snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-24 09:45 +0000
            Re: Hey DildoRider... Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:51 -0800
        Re: Hey DildoRider... Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:52 -0800
  Re: Hey DildoRider... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-21 02:55 -0700

csiph-web