Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.food.fast-food > #40858
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | <0387d742a9fa4b4ee5411fb285238a3d@dizum.com> <vkbucbdugdj8tpaceu7os8p39fcp9kmqpi@4ax.com> <13291dc36d92f681496f06e6131e31ed@dizum.com> <q8lucb1v9ls6qk4br2mn9igbpmclapc1rj@4ax.com> |
| Subject | Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! |
| Message-ID | <8ba03f4dc33bb34a7a4103a01dea0f96@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2016-02-26 07:18 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.food.fast-food, alt.free.newsservers, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in <news:q8lucb1v9ls6qk4br2mn9igbpmclapc1rj@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: Froups desnecked, Coward. > Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus > <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > <cry whine snivel scream> Translation: "I'll k'lame it's 'cry whine snivel scream' and snip it out so I can run away from that which SPNAK!s me so hard I cry, whine snivel and scream." <snicker> >> In my previous graph proving you and DildoRider *wrong*, I graphed Cowardly snipping restored: >> In my previous graph proving you and DildoRider *wrong*, I graphed >> both the 170 volt peak L-N *and* the 120.208 volt RMS L-N, Spankard. >> I've been right all along. > The only thing you proved is that you're uneducable. You're projecting, Moron. LOL > You'd rather be ignorant than admit you're wrong from the > gitgo. Except I'm right. You're just a cowardly snipping moron. <snicker> >>> There is no graph 5. >> Yeah, there is. > Nope. Draw it again. Moron yet again demonstrates his inability to read a graph. LOL >>>> result of 339.415 volts when the phases are subtracted, in violation >>>> of Watt's Law and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law. >>> LOL! You only just now learned how to draw a 120v sine >>> wave. You don't understand Ohm's Laws, or Watt's Law (which >>> is just the power part of Ohm's Laws), and you have no clue >>> how to add voltages. Let alone add voltages in a loop. >>> Kirchoff's? LOL. You're just throwing shit up on the wall >>> again, hoping someone will think you actually understand it. >>> >>> Hint: Kirchoff's is for loops. You're still struggling >>> with sines. >> Moron: >> <http://people.sinclair.edu/nickreeder/eet1155/mod02.htm> >> "Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) says that the sum of the voltage drops >> around any closed loop in a circuit equals the sum of the voltage >> rises around that loop." > Voltage rises... heheh! > > In clearer words, the sum of all the voltages in a closed > loop is zero. > > But you can't add sin(this) + sin(that) with a calculator, > let alone figure out voltage drops. That's not how you do sinewave summation, Moron. If you knew how to use the Euler sinewave summation, you'd realize that. But you don't, because you're a moron. SPNAK! >> Now you'll be getting right on explaining how the vector sum of the >> three phases of 3-phase AC *isn't* a closed loop. > Bwahahahahaaaa!! > Closed loop! Kasnjork! > > That's not even close to what a closed loop means, dweebus. > Keep poring over Google. This is getting better. Says the moron Google-raping at all hours, only to frustratedly prove himself a bigger and bigger moron. LOL > Show us how euler's theorem is used to add up sines, and Already done, graphed and explained. You're just too big a moron to understand it. > maybe i'll think about explaining something. Translation: "I'll continue k'laming you've provided no proof so I don't have to provide any proof... because I can't. Because I'm a moron." <snicker> > Then again, you don't know how to listen or understand > anything. > > Fakey, can i quote you as saying "3-phase AC power > constitutes a closed loop!" ? That's .siggy-grade shit. Sure, in fact, you can even quote me mathematically: sinewave 1 + sinewave 2 + sinewave 3 = 0 In accordance with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law. And this: <http://www.tina.com/course/31three/three> "The delta or D-connection of three phases is achieved by connecting the three loads in series forming a closed loop." Does... does that say three phases connected in series forms a closed loop... gee, that's how a delta transformer or 3-phase motor works, isn't it? <http://www.tpub.com/neets/book5/17c.htm> "The primary windings, for example, are connected to each other to form a closed loop." Does... does that say three phases connected in series forms a closed loop... gee, that's how an alternator works, isn't it? <http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/three-phase-y-delta-configurations/> "One quick check of this is to use Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law to see if the three voltages around the loop add up to zero." Does... does that prove you *wrong* on two fronts... that Kirchhoff's Voltage Law *is* used for 3-phase AC, *and* that 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop across all three phases? Yeah... yeah it does. SPNAK! on the know-nothing moron. <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Brain (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms; That superposition is the same as wave interference; That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves; That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things; That RMS isn't a DC voltage; That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1; The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave; That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering; What a positive or negative vector is; That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero; And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
Back to alt.food.fast-food | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:24 +0100
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 03:08 -0500
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 00:54 +0800
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 11:57 -0500
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 01:04 +0800
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 19:57 +0100
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! El Chapo <Coca@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-25 12:20 -0700
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 07:18 +0100
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-26 01:54 -0700
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 05:31 -0800
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-26 10:36 -0500
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-27 00:39 +0800
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 12:44 -0800
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 20:58 +0100
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 21:50 +0100
Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 06:26 +0100
csiph-web