Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.food.fast-food > #40851

Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK!

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:vkbucbdugdj8tpaceu7os8p39fcp9kmqpi@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> The ultimate graphical refutation of DildoRider's kooky sinewave
>> subtraction equation:
>> 
>> <http://i.imgur.com/qK3Xeu5.png>
>> 
>> Graph 1: 169.71 peak voltage, 0 degrees phase (red)
>> 
>> Graph 2: 169.71 peak voltage, 120 degrees phase (green)
>> 
>> Graph 3: 169.71 peak voltage, 240 degrees phase (black)

> Woooofuckinghooooooo!  Fakey finally figgered out how to
> graph a 120v sinusoid!.... but only after i spanked him a
> dozen times about his wrong "sinewaves".

Moron k'lames 169.71 = 120 just like he k'lamed 4444525800 =
4400000000 = 1. Because he's a moron. LOL

In my previous graph proving you and DildoRider *wrong*, I graphed
both the 170 volt peak L-N *and* the 120.208 volt RMS L-N, Spankard.
I've been right all along.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; that 4444525800 != 4400000000 !=
1; that there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical
engineering, physics and control systems engineering; what a positive
or negative vector is; and the moron continues to demonstrate his
inability to read a graph.

SPNAK!

> Wowwwwww!

>> Graph 4: Phase A (Graph 1) - Phase B (Graph 2) - Phase C (Graph 3)
>> (blue) (DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation)

> No clue what that's supposed to be.

That's wrong, is what that is. If you weren't a moron, you'd know
that. LOL

>> Graph 5: Phase A (Graph 1) + Phase B (Graph 2) + Phase C (Graph 3)
>> (orange) (the proper Euler sinewave summation equation)

> There is no graph 5.

Yeah, there is. You're just a moron demonstrating yet again that you
can't read a graph. LOL

>> You'll note DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation gives a
>> result of 339.415 volts when the phases are subtracted, in violation
>> of Watt's Law and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law.

> LOL!  You only just now learned how to draw a 120v sine
> wave.  You don't understand Ohm's Laws, or Watt's Law (which
> is just the power part of Ohm's Laws), and you have no clue
> how to add voltages.  Let alone add voltages in a loop.
> Kirchoff's?  LOL.  You're just throwing shit up on the wall
> again, hoping someone will think you actually understand it.
> 
> Hint:  Kirchoff's is for loops.  You're still struggling
> with sines.

Moron:
<http://people.sinclair.edu/nickreeder/eet1155/mod02.htm>
"Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) says that the sum of the voltage drops
around any closed loop in a circuit equals the sum of the voltage
rises around that loop."

Now you'll be getting right on explaining how the vector sum of the
three phases of 3-phase AC *isn't* a closed loop. That is, after all,
why summing the three phases gives a result of 0, just as Kirchhoff's
Voltage Law states.

SPNAK!

> Stay in school, kid.

Moron k'lames 3-phase AC power doesn't constitute a closed loop! Of
course, moron also k'lames that 0 volts graphed isn't graphed, because
he's a moron. LOL

>> Conversely, the proper Euler sinewave summation equation gives the
>> proper 0 volts.

> You don't use Euler's Theorem to add sinewaves.

Yeah, you do. You're just a moron. LOL

> And you don't know how to show us an example of doing so.

I already have. You're just a moron. LOL

> Because you're all blither-blather, and no show.

Already shown. You're just a moron. LOL

SPNAK!

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.food.fast-food | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 08:24 +0100
  Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 03:08 -0500
  Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 00:54 +0800
    Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 11:57 -0500
      Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 01:04 +0800
    Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 19:57 +0100
      Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! El Chapo <Coca@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-25 12:20 -0700
      Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 07:18 +0100
        Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-26 01:54 -0700
          Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 05:31 -0800
          Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-26 10:36 -0500
            Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-27 00:39 +0800
              Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-26 12:44 -0800
        Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 20:58 +0100
        Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 21:50 +0100
    Re: Ultimate Sinewave SPNAK! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 06:26 +0100

csiph-web