Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom |
| Date | 2021-07-17 00:11 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87y2a5onur.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <20210716223332.000031bf@reddwarf.jmc> <87fswdq4rf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <sct2b6$lrr$1@dont-email.me> |
Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> writes: > On 7/16/2021 4:21 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >> Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> writes: >> >>> The halting problem being undecidable is NOT a fucking axiom; >> Agreed. It follows logically from most reasonable sets of axioms. >> Interestingly, halting being decidable /can/ be taken as an axiom >> without introducing any inconsistency. > > In what base system or systems is the above true? I'm thinking "in the > sense" that Godel follows in systems that allow sufficient arithmetic. > I'm not sure I'm asking this question in the best way; if not, please > help me out. And I'm sure I'm not putting correctly. What I mean is that the theory of halting-oracle TMs is consistent. Of course, it has it's own halting theorem: halting-oracle TM halting is not decidable by any halting-oracle TM and there's an infinite chain of such theories. -- Ben.
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
HP undecidability is not an axiom Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 22:33 +0100
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 17:02 -0500
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 23:21 +0100
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 16:48 -0600
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 00:11 +0100
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 23:07 -0600
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 21:15 +0100
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-17 17:30 -0600
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-17 12:00 +0000
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-17 13:03 +0100
Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-17 12:30 +0000
csiph-web