HP undecidability is not an axiom

From	Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc>
Newsgroups	comp.theory
Subject	HP undecidability is not an axiom
Message-ID	<20210716223332.000031bf@reddwarf.jmc> (permalink)
Organization	Jupiter Mining Corp
Date	2021-07-16 22:33 +0100

Show all headers | View raw

The halting problem being undecidable is NOT a fucking axiom; you
can't go about saying:

"Since the halting problem is known to be undecidable blah blah fucking
blah" in your fucking proofs.

Mr Flibble is very cross at all the laziness in this area of "research".

/Flibble

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

HP undecidability is not an axiom Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 22:33 +0100
  Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 17:02 -0500
  Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 23:21 +0100
    Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 16:48 -0600
      Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 00:11 +0100
        Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 23:07 -0600
          Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 21:15 +0100
            Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-17 17:30 -0600
  Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-17 12:00 +0000
    Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-17 13:03 +0100
      Re: HP undecidability is not an axiom Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-17 12:30 +0000

csiph-web