Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243358

Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations

From	Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations
Date	2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Organization	gnu
Message-ID	<87siodyhhe.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <XnsA32B4F4A75BE4tattoovampire@178.63.61.145> <87siof2oj5.fsf@gmail.com> <b946d82b-e377-47cd-849c-4eebe76d96db@googlegroups.com> <lkqu0r$kt9$2@dont-email.me> <p1zv2f3piian.1nwbznchxao34$.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw

flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts.
>>> 
>>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to
>>> wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The
>>> idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve
>>> Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to
>>> write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is
>>> ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the
>>> way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve
>>> Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever
>>> having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially
>>> bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to
>>> having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many
>>> times.  While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing
>>> this than anyone else.
>>> 
>>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one
>>> being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda).  Your real problem with
>>> me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is
>>> concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like
>>> a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that
>>> everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated).
>> 
>> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and
>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a
>> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts
>> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid
>> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly.
>
> I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to.
> It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person.
>
> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person
> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a
> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of
> others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think
> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone
> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade?
> Doesn't make sense.

Err, someone does. So why not Carroll.

Mind you... it could be you....

-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Thread

Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
  Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
      Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
          Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
            Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations 	flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
              Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
                Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
        Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
    Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700

csiph-web