Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #243070 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 77 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 18:49 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 03:54 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-11 19:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 02:35 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 11:47 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:02 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:48 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:27 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 11:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 16:26 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 13:31 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:01 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:56 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:21 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:11 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> - 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 17:13 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:19 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:50 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-05-12 20:52 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2014-05-12 20:57 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 20:32 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 07:57 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 17:48 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:16 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-12 18:08 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 10:22 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 11:29 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-05-12 11:34 -0600
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-05-12 23:04 +0000
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 16:23 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 10:57 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 13:28 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-05-13 12:59 +0100
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-05-13 15:24 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:43 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:39 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2014-05-13 15:42 +0200
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Silver Slimer <ndr@slvrlps.c> - 2014-05-13 10:14 -0400
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-13 08:42 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-13 08:11 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700
Re: Liberals want more funding for science and stangulations Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-05-12 08:52 -0700
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 20:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <V4adnclw-876FOzOnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243297 |
On 05/12/14 18:52, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 5:11:03 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 5/12/2014 4:21 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Monday, May 12, 2014 3:56:01 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> >> >>> (snip) >> >>> >> >>>> I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the >>>> simplest explanation is usually the correct one. >> >>> Well, flatfish claims to be a 'she' as of late so I'll go with that... she claims there are these "errors" but doesn't say what they are (troll tactic 101 in my opinion). >> >>> >> >> Flatfish has mentioned being a woman before snit even shown up in here. > > I know. Why did you just use the term "he"? You think flatty is really a he, not a her? > > Her. My typical mistake on usenet when all I see is a lot of text. >>>>> Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? >> >>>> I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. >> >>> I'd say that's debatable on a per case basis... as opposed to the constantly lying Snit. In any event, it's not like she's been a paragon of virtue herself ;) > > >> Nah... just poking the bees nest to watch all the hypocrites go into action. > > You forget that I saw her in her own versions of action back then... I'm still seeing it. I suspect she knows that I'm not forging myself and that I'm the real Steve Carroll. I'm convinced that she looked at the page I created for her last week but she's got her agenda rolling and reality just gets in its way: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/qMfJ0aX7p0Q/x2-SxbpzogcJ > >> When I first was in here, I played the very same game... lied a lot >> about linux, when in fact linux back then wasn't really that good. >> >> I came back in to watch and noticed that the advocates have gotten >> nastier... just about everybody was quite nasty. I stayed out for >> another year. Came back in, and lo and behold there was snit doing his >> usual thing. I got whammied over using Windows 7, while Turdv gets a pass. > > Yeah, I saw. > >>> I'm not sure the closet parts fits, he's pretty open with that stuff. >> >> It goes a bit deeper, but I think you can figure that part out. >> Eventually, his handlers will discard him like a used rubber. > > I think his "handlers" are probably bound by law to make sure he never sees the light of day again ;) This is written in history. In the end the useful fools always get shitcanned by their handlers. -- When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the bottom, and have a longer blanket."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 20:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF96DA03.371F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243313 |
On 5/12/14, 7:54 PM, in article
V4adnclw-876FOzOnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com>
wrote:
>>> It goes a bit deeper, but I think you can figure that part out.
>>> Eventually, his handlers will discard him like a used rubber.
>>
>> I think his "handlers" are probably bound by law to make sure he never sees
>> the light of day again ;)
>
> This is written in history. In the end the useful fools always get
> shitcanned by their handlers.
Well then, Carroll is destined to "shitcan" you. That is OK, I am sure NASA
will gladly accept you as a consultant.
<http://youtu.be/20MBl_4eofo>
Technically a bit of a disaster of a video but still one of my favorites. :)
--
* Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto>
* Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 18:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1kvhei5aode7v$.1adrs2cvb38ic.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243242 |
On Mon, 12 May 2014 15:56:01 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/12/2014 3:01 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Monday, May 12, 2014 2:26:28 PM UTC-6, flatfish+++ wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >>> >>>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >>> >>>> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >>> >>>> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >>> >>>> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. >>> >>> >>> >>> I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. >>> >>> It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. >>> >>> >>> >>> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person >>> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a >>> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of >>> others that escape my mind at the moment. >> >> LOL! Nice try ;) >> >> There are no such "errors" that "confirm" anything for anyone who looks only at reality... and that reality is: I'm posting using only fretwizzer. No one can find *anything* that is contrary to that fact because there isn't anything to find. >> >>> Personally, I don't think >>> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. >> >> You're wrong... or purposefully lying. > > I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the > simplest explanation is usually the correct one. Exactly. What is more likely: 1. Many people complaining about a single person. Websites devoted to exposing this person's trolling methods. Or 2. That person claiming he is a victim. >> That even your co-trolls DFS and "Hadron" don't know when to believe you should tell you something about your posting history. >> >>> Why would someone >>> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? >> >> Why do you keep hounding Linux users for so long? >> > > I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. She's gone over to > the closed group and watched them tell just the opposite stories. > So it is obvious she is just pointing out their hypocrisy, which is what > I found out about last year. Linux users are pathological liars. It's easy to catch them in their own lies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 16:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF96A5D4.371AE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243250 |
On 5/12/14, 3:58 PM, in article 1kvhei5aode7v$.1adrs2cvb38ic.dlg@40tude.net, "flatfish+++" <phlatphish@yahoo.com> wrote: ... >>>> Personally, I don't think >>>> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. >>> >>> You're wrong... or purposefully lying. >> >> I doubt that he is lying... but more like using occams razor... the >> simplest explanation is usually the correct one. > > Exactly. > > What is more likely: > > 1. Many people complaining about a single person. Websites devoted to > exposing this person's trolling methods. > > Or > > 2. That person claiming he is a victim. I make the choice to be honest and honorable in a group where such things are rare. I make the choice to use evidence and logic and reason in a group where such things are not generally understood or respected. I make the choice to call people out on their unsupported claims and their lies. And you guys flip out... and it pisses you off that you rarely find examples of me being wrong or lying. You know I am far more reasonable, logical, honest, and honorable than you are. Not that I am more so than many other people, but in COLA it is uncommon. ... >> I'd say it is because they aren't telling the truth. She's gone over to >> the closed group and watched them tell just the opposite stories. >> So it is obvious she is just pointing out their hypocrisy, which is what >> I found out about last year. > > Linux users are pathological liars. > It's easy to catch them in their own lies. Yes, as it was easy to show your claims about Onion Knight to be wrong. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <HJmdnQudgbcvpOzOnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243221 |
On 5/12/2014 2:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >>> >>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. >>> >>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). >> >> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. > > I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. > It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. > > There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person > posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a > few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of > others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think > the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone > follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? > Doesn't make sense. > > Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. > The only way to find out the real truth is when someday snit croaks. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 20:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkro18$hsi$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243236 |
On 14-05-12 05:14 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/12/2014 2:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: >> On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >>>> >>>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. >>>> >>>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). >>> >>> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >>> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >>> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >>> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. >> >> I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. >> It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. >> >> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person >> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a >> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of >> others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think >> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone >> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? >> Doesn't make sense. >> >> Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. >> > The only way to find out the real truth is when someday snit croaks. The most annoying people never die. I expect Snatch the Clown to keep posting here far into his 90's. By then, GNU/Linux *STILL* won't have decent screencasting software and he won't stop reminding us. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 17:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF96B2D3.371BE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243273 |
On 5/12/14, 5:12 PM, in article lkro18$hsi$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> wrote: >>> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person >>> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a >>> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of >>> others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think >>> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone >>> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? >>> Doesn't make sense. >>> >>> Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. >>> >> The only way to find out the real truth is when someday snit croaks. > > The most annoying people never die. I expect Snatch the Clown to keep > posting here far into his 90's. By then, GNU/Linux *STILL* won't have > decent screencasting software and he won't stop reminding us. I will also keep reminding you how you could not refute the video about the NRA... well, I will if you are still showing so much anger over it. :) -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 17:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <848e67d4-ac29-4933-8f32-1b0f78b5c3cc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243273 |
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 12:12:24 AM UTC, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-12 05:14 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > > On 5/12/2014 2:26 PM, flatfish+++ wrote: > > >> On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. > > >>>> > > >>>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. > > >>>> > > >>>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). > > >>> > > >>> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and > > >>> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a > > >>> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts > > >>> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid > > >>> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. > > >> > > >> I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. > > >> It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. > > >> > > >> There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person > > >> posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a > > >> few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of > > >> others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think > > >> the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone > > >> follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? > > >> Doesn't make sense. > > >> > > >> Once again, add up all the little pieces and judge for yourself. > > >> > > > The only way to find out the real truth is when someday snit croaks. > > > > The most annoying people never die. I expect Snatch the Clown to keep > > posting here far into his 90's. By then, GNU/Linux *STILL* won't have > > decent screencasting software and he won't stop reminding us. > Remember you were his shill for a long time. Now you are simply calling him names but not working to get him out of COLA. Go back to posting the Snit List. > > -- > > Silver Slimer > > Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter Another forum ruined by Michael Glasser Prescott Computer Guy of Prescott, Arizona 86301 http://prescottcomputerguy.com The best web design in Prescott, AZ is shown at his website http://prescottcomputerguy.com/web-design.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-13 14:45 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87siodyhhe.fsf@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #243221 |
flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> writes: > On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:48:27 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. >>> >>> And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to >>> wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The >>> idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve >>> Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to >>> write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is >>> ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the >>> way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve >>> Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever >>> having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially >>> bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to >>> having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many >>> times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing >>> this than anyone else. >>> >>> What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one >>> being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with >>> me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is >>> concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like >>> a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that >>> everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). >> >> I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a >> result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts >> has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid >> points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. > > I have them scored down so I can read them if I choose to. > It's fairly obvious that they are all the same person. > > There have been some errors made lately that confirm it's one person > posting as fretwizzer, fretwizzen and fretwizzin, phlatphish and a > few others like Lungo, dvdbreaker,Larry Washington and a couple of > others that escape my mind at the moment. Personally, I don't think > the real Steve Carroll has posted here in years. Why would someone > follow an idiot like snit for more than a decade? > Doesn't make sense. Err, someone does. So why not Carroll. Mind you... it could be you.... -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a78e703c-d058-451a-a0de-f83fd9ebfa5c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243151 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 10:48:27 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-12 12:29 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > Fact: You have no proof that I 'm using other email addresses with other gmail accounts. > > > > > > And there's a reason for that, I'm not doing it. The idea that I'm going to wake up at 5:30 in the morning and go straight to COLA is "ridiculous". The idea that I need to use another account for the purpose of posting as Steve Carroll is ridiculous. The idea that I would use these kinds of accounts to write many of the same sort of things I've written about Snit is ridiculous. Additionally you've never seen me "advertise" Snit's business the way the forger(s) do. You'll also notice that the forged versions of Steve Carroll contain bigoted, anti-gay tirades, a thing you can't point to me ever having done. For years, Snit has tried to make it appear I am racially bigoted and anti-gay. For years, Snit has forged my ID and has admitted to having done so very early in the game. I've pointed to this admission many times. While it's not proof, there is far more evidence that Snit is doing this than anyone else. > > > > > > What does this all add up to? Either you are the forger or you're the one being ridiculous here (or both... for your agenda). Your real problem with me is that I've pointed out how divergent you are from reality where Snit is concerned. All you're doing here is compounding your problem (of looking like a total fool), you'd do better to just STFU about Snit's character (that everyone has had more than enough of, as they've stated). > > > > I, for one, have had the fretwizzen@, fretwizzin@, phlatphishh@ and > > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com headers banned for a while now. As a > > result, I see very few posts in the group but the quality of the posts > > has improved dramatically. I don't miss the enumerations of stupid > > points Snatch the Clown would post repeatedly. Even Hadron can post in a sensible manner when he's not defending the ringmaster. In any event, it's pretty telling when they are both responding to the forgeries of me but not to me. For some reason they're not able to comprehend why this would be the case for the reader with a working brain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 08:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF963C0B.370E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243080 |
On 5/12/14, 4:47 AM, in article XnsA32B4F4A75BE4tattoovampire@178.63.61.145, "Tattoo Vampire" <sitting@this.computer> wrote: > Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > >> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >> taking it? > > That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > years. Baseless accusation. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lZCdnd59tMO5aO3OnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243080 |
On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: > Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > >> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >> taking it? > > That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > years. > Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@strtml.cm> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 12:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lkqtrp$kt9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #243136 |
On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: >> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: >> >>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >>> taking it? >> >> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for >> years. >> > Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications. -- Silver Slimer Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f2a2dbf3-f992-4d06-b21e-059d5948fe98@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243148 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 9:45:45 AM UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > > On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: > > >> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > > >> > > >>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of > > >>> taking it? > > >> > > >> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > > >> years. > > >> > > > Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. > > > > You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd > > consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, > > since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by > > such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. > > > > I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux > > doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL > > doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that > > GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications. > > > > -- > > Silver Slimer > > Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter Thru the years in the past the Usenet has drawn quite of few that have become authors of books or website on the topics of there group of interest. A bit stimulation from a group seems to help the mind provide one doesn't go OCD on another/others. enough for now...........Trig
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CF9654A4.3711F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #243156 |
On 5/12/14, 10:02 AM, in article f2a2dbf3-f992-4d06-b21e-059d5948fe98@googlegroups.com, "Poisoned by Win 8.1" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 9:45:45 AM UTC-7, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: >> >>>> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >> >>>>> taking it? >> >>>> >> >>>> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for >> >>>> years. >> >>>> >> >>> Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. >> >> >> >> You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd >> >> consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, >> >> since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by >> >> such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. >> >> >> >> I can already imagine some of the chapter titles; Chapter 5: GNU/Linux >> >> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 11: GNU/Linux STILL >> >> doesn't have screencasting applications, Chapter 17: It's silly that >> >> GNU/Linux doesn't have screencasting applications. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Silver Slimer >> >> Wikipedia & OpenMedia Supporter > > Thru the years in the past the Usenet has drawn quite of few that > have become authors of books or website on the topics of there group of > interest. > > A bit stimulation from a group seems to help the mind provide one > doesn't go OCD on another/others. > > enough for now...........Trig Maybe Silver Slimer can use his anger to motivate him to write a book. -- * Mint MATE: Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint / LibreOffice: <http://youtu.be/USU9iqppfto> * Win 8 / Word 2013: <http://youtu.be/z8gUL2TCcV4> * Mavericks / Pages 5.1: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <86e04137-4b49-423e-825f-1521351da228@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243167 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:36:20 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: (snip) > Maybe Silver Slimer can use his anger to motivate him to write a book. That's one of your two usual story lines for people that complain about your BS, the other is your allegation of their dishonesty (you even went so far to say that you are a 'rare breed' of honest in COLA and CSMA). It's "interesting how you've managed to find *so many* angry and dishonest people on usenet, far more so given how the vast majority of them are confined to just 2 newsgroups. The odds are beyond astronomical! How do you account for that? Oh, that's right... you really can't in any way that uses "logic and reason".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 10:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <973e2407-2207-4cdd-b4fb-c898a1d64308@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243148 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 10:45:45 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > > On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: > > >> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > > >> > > >>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of > > >>> taking it? > > >> > > >> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > > >> years. > > >> > > > Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. > > > > You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd > > consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, > > since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by > > such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. Really ;) Seriously, though, regarding the time aspect, the point of me tweaking his site's Wordpress theme was to show him how quickly it could be done, I even offered to give him the theme. Why hasn't he spent at least *some* time on his own business site in the last 5 years or so? That's just plain weird for a web development business. Speaking of his business, why are there these forgeries of me that 'advertise' it the way they do (a thing I've spoken out against many times)? Are the two related in any way? Is it possible that Snit is doing it so he can tell his wife that 'usenet trolls' (his favorite, 'Steve Carroll') ruined his business prospects while at the same time attempt to besmirch me by making me out to be a racially bigoted, antigay nitiwit, a thing he's been trying and failing to do for a decade on usenet? Given his history of forgery/dishonesty, his obvious hatred of me and his *total* lack of interest in his business site, I'd say it's an extremely strong possibility.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <wpKdnbDBbbhX3uzOnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #243157 |
On 5/12/2014 11:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, May 12, 2014 10:45:45 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: >> >>>> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >> >>>>> taking it? >> >>>> >> >>>> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for >> >>>> years. >> >>>> >> >>> Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. >> >> >> >> You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd >> >> consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, >> >> since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by >> >> such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. > > Really ;) > > Seriously, though, regarding the time aspect, the point of me tweaking his site's Wordpress theme was to show him how quickly it could be done, I even offered to give him the theme. Why hasn't he spent at least *some* time on his own business site in the last 5 years or so? That's just plain weird for a web development business. > > Speaking of his business, why are there these forgeries of me that 'advertise' it the way they do (a thing I've spoken out against many times)? Are the two related in any way? Is it possible that Snit is doing it so he can tell his wife that 'usenet trolls' (his favorite, 'Steve Carroll') ruined his business prospects while at the same time attempt to besmirch me by making me out to be a racially bigoted, antigay nitiwit, a thing he's been trying and failing to do for a decade on usenet? Given his history of forgery/dishonesty, his obvious hatred of me and his *total* lack of interest in his business site, I'd say it's an extremely strong possibility. > How come snit doesn't respond to you directly??? -- We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true -- Robert Wilensky, 1997
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 15:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ecad30ab-6f5c-4883-8aca-2b99d8964464@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #243243 |
On Monday, May 12, 2014 3:57:29 PM UTC-6, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/12/2014 11:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, May 12, 2014 10:45:45 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > > >> On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: > > >> > > >>>> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: > > >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of > > >> > > >>>>> taking it? > > >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for > > >> > > >>>> years. > > >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>> Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd > > >> > > >> consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, > > >> > > >> since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by > > >> > > >> such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. > > > > > > Really ;) > > > > > > Seriously, though, regarding the time aspect, the point of me tweaking his site's Wordpress theme was to show him how quickly it could be done, I even offered to give him the theme. Why hasn't he spent at least *some* time on his own business site in the last 5 years or so? That's just plain weird for a web development business. > > > > > > Speaking of his business, why are there these forgeries of me that 'advertise' it the way they do (a thing I've spoken out against many times)? Are the two related in any way? Is it possible that Snit is doing it so he can tell his wife that 'usenet trolls' (his favorite, 'Steve Carroll') ruined his business prospects while at the same time attempt to besmirch me by making me out to be a racially bigoted, antigay nitiwit, a thing he's been trying and failing to do for a decade on usenet? Given his history of forgery/dishonesty, his obvious hatred of me and his *total* lack of interest in his business site, I'd say it's an extremely strong possibility. > > > > > > > How come snit doesn't respond to you directly??? I challenge his BS. He's only started doing so in the last day or two because I mentioned he was responding to forgeries of me but not me. This is really no different than when he's posting a lot and I mention it, he'll then ease up a tad for a short while but in a couple of days or so he's right back at it. He's really not very bright, mainly because he thinks people don't notice the obvious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-05-12 19:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <dhwi2tk4qk1j.17hqb031uejuf.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #243243 |
On Mon, 12 May 2014 15:57:29 -0600, GreyCloud wrote: > On 5/12/2014 11:09 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Monday, May 12, 2014 10:45:45 AM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> On 14-05-12 12:21 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/12/2014 5:47 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote: >>> >>>>> Poisoned by Win 8.1 wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>> Steve, Are you missing your blowup doll? And you suspect "Snit" of >>> >>>>>> taking it? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> That isn't Steve Carroll. It's Snot forging him again, as he has been for >>> >>>>> years. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> Snit likes to talk to himself a lot. Typical of a pscyhopath. >>> >>> >>> >>> You'd think that with all of the time that he has on his hands, he'd >>> >>> consider doing something more productive like write a book. After all, >>> >>> since he's the authority on everything under the sun, a book written by >>> >>> such a knowledgeable mind is sure to sell like hotcakes. >> >> Really ;) >> >> Seriously, though, regarding the time aspect, the point of me tweaking his site's Wordpress theme was to show him how quickly it could be done, I even offered to give him the theme. Why hasn't he spent at least *some* time on his own business site in the last 5 years or so? That's just plain weird for a web development business. >> >> Speaking of his business, why are there these forgeries of me that 'advertise' it the way they do (a thing I've spoken out against many times)? Are the two related in any way? Is it possible that Snit is doing it so he can tell his wife that 'usenet trolls' (his favorite, 'Steve Carroll') ruined his business prospects while at the same time attempt to besmirch me by making me out to be a racially bigoted, antigay nitiwit, a thing he's been trying and failing to do for a decade on usenet? Given his history of forgery/dishonesty, his obvious hatred of me and his *total* lack of interest in his business site, I'd say it's an extremely strong possibility. >> > > How come snit doesn't respond to you directly??? Because snit would be talking to himself. Ever notice how all these "Steve Carroll" nyms show up at the same time? Ever notice they all use the same TOR servers? It's all one person. Most likely snit mobilizing his sock puppet army.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web