Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" |
| Date | 2014-11-01 22:05 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87sii21yby.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <m32ptg$jiu$2@dont-email.me> <878ujv2e0b.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <m32rcg$snp$1@dont-email.me> <874mui3nto.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <m334hv$u17$1@dont-email.me> |
Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net>: > If you _WANT_ your daemon to communicate with DBUS with systemd, read > the docs. Finally we are approaching what I asked in the beginning: how does one write a systemd-aware daemon? I know systemd can deal with a number of schemes to interface with legacy daemons with better or worse results. But are you saying systemd doesn't have any native or preferred daemon interface or policy? If that is indeed the systemd way, you could have said that right away (and pointed to the documentation stating that fact). In fact, it seems the opposite is the case. <URL: http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/sd_notify.html> documents a C library interface for the daemon to chat directly with systemd. And finally, I can make progress with my "strong doubts." I laud systemd for trying to bring clarity to the daemon lifecycle. However, I don't like it depending on a shared library. Instead, it should be defined like X11 and Wayland: through a protocol. Obviously, underlying sd_notify() is some sort of protocol that could be reverse-engineered with a moderate effort. I think it should be front-page material on systemd documentation. Marko
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-10-24 20:41 +0000
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-10-24 23:57 +0300
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-10-25 01:55 +0000
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-10-26 19:23 +0000
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-10-27 22:17 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-10-27 22:56 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Kara M'bola <maxupixu@in.val.it> - 2014-10-28 11:27 +0000
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" "D.D." <usenet.xyzzyx@spamgourmet.com> - 2014-10-28 04:34 -0700
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-10-31 19:04 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-10-31 19:51 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-10-31 14:55 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-10-31 23:48 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-10-31 18:58 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-01 01:23 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-10-31 21:50 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-01 09:14 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 10:15 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-01 16:26 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 10:40 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-11-01 16:07 +0100
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 13:20 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-11-01 23:48 +0100
Re: systemd documentation Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 19:53 -0400
Re: systemd documentation Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> - 2014-11-02 01:11 +0100
Re: systemd documentation Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 21:25 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-02 10:37 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-02 10:13 -0500
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-01 18:09 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 13:16 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-01 22:05 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> - 2014-11-01 19:39 -0400
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-02 10:57 +0200
Re: Lunduke says "lxde desktop is nothing to write home about" Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-11-14 20:21 +0200
csiph-web