Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.fortran > #40865
| From | Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.fortran, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? |
| Date | 2014-03-13 14:56 +0100 |
| Organization | http://www.ieee.org/ |
| Message-ID | <87lhwejj7v.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <lfq0fp$4dp$1@dont-email.me> <bocekjFts3fU1@mid.uni-berlin.de> <rvc3i99fhvn87h92537vv0bkfd7rlmj54n@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> writes: > On 13 Mar 2014 01:06:29 GMT, jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) > wrote: > > <snip> > >>And the whole layout >>of the code isn't very convincing: >> >> if ((err = SSLFreeBuffer(&hashCtx)) != 0) >> goto fail; >> if ((err = ReadyHash(&SSLHashSHA1, &hashCtx)) != 0) >> goto fail; >> if ((err = SSLHashSHA1.update(&hashCtx &clientRandom)) != 0) >> goto fail; > > <snip> > >>Why not make it more easy to read like e.g. >> >> if ( ( err = SSLFreeBuffer( &hashCtx ) ) >> || ( err = ReadyHash( &SSLHashSHA1, &hashCtx ) ) >> || ( err = SSLHashSHA1.update( &hashCtx &clientRandom ) ) ) >> goto fail; > > The latter is easier to read, but the former, with each function call > in a separate statement on a different line, is likely to be easier to > step through with a debugger. When the code takes the error branch, > you know with a bit more confidence which function returned an error. If you have to use a debugger your code is already broken according to the regs here who have never ever had to use one. Debugging is ten times harder than making the code correct the first time apparently ..... -- "Avoid hyperbole at all costs, its the most destructive argument on the planet" - Mark McIntyre in comp.lang.c
Back to comp.lang.fortran | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-12 12:17 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-12 09:20 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-18 16:30 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-18 21:48 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-18 19:10 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-19 20:39 +1100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ftinetti@gmail.com - 2014-03-19 03:41 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ftinetti@gmail.com - 2014-03-18 16:45 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-18 19:14 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-18 17:36 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-19 07:34 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-19 12:08 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-19 10:07 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 17:05 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 12:27 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 13:04 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 13:26 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 13:36 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? dpb <none@non.net> - 2014-03-19 14:02 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 13:36 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 16:48 -0300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-19 20:35 +1100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-19 12:26 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 13:23 -0300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? e p chandler <epc8@juno.com> - 2014-03-12 10:05 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-12 16:47 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-03-12 18:50 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gordon Sande <Gordon.Sande@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 16:16 -0300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2014-03-12 12:49 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-12 21:54 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Lynn McGuire <lmc@winsim.com> - 2014-03-12 16:57 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-12 22:00 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? John Harper <john.harper@vuw.ac.nz> - 2014-03-13 11:23 +1300
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-12 15:36 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 23:40 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-13 11:25 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Jahns <jahns@idontlikespam.dkrz.de> - 2014-03-14 11:24 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-14 23:32 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2014-03-15 13:43 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-15 16:28 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dr Nick <nospam-4@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2014-03-15 16:01 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-17 08:51 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-13 11:22 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Jake <thatcadguy@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 12:25 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-12 15:34 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2014-03-13 01:06 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? fj <francois.jacq@irsn.fr> - 2014-03-12 18:31 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-12 21:08 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Dick Hendrickson <dick.hendrickson@att.net> - 2014-03-13 10:54 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-13 19:53 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-13 20:16 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-13 21:57 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wilson <winslole@udayton.edu> - 2014-03-13 03:59 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wilson <winslole@udayton.edu> - 2014-03-13 05:02 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> - 2014-03-13 07:42 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard <rgrdev_@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 14:56 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-13 00:59 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Wolfgang Kilian <kilian@invalid.com> - 2014-03-13 09:10 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2014-03-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Qolin" <noone@nowhere.com> - 2014-03-13 21:24 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-13 22:36 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-13 17:54 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robert.corbett@oracle.com - 2014-03-13 23:43 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-13 18:07 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:02 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-14 04:07 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:56 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---undress to reply) - 2014-03-14 09:17 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2014-03-15 11:57 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-15 16:38 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-03-15 18:09 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? wclodius@earthlink.net (William Clodius) - 2014-03-15 19:57 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? nospam@see.signature (Richard Maine) - 2014-03-15 19:41 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-13 22:42 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-13 17:13 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-13 16:46 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-03-14 01:17 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-03-13 23:04 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-14 10:41 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 09:55 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-03-14 13:16 +0100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2014-03-18 21:08 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-18 17:41 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? robin.vowels@gmail.com - 2014-03-20 03:55 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 00:45 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-13 21:40 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 01:02 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-14 10:36 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-14 17:30 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 13:51 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-14 13:12 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 05:29 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "James Van Buskirk" <not_valid@comcast.net> - 2014-03-14 10:47 -0600
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-03-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-03-14 13:52 -0400
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2014-03-16 17:15 -0500
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-03-16 16:04 -0700
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-03-14 05:11 +0000
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? "Terence" <tbwright@bigpond.net.au> - 2014-03-14 08:32 +1100
Re: Is goto Still Considered Harmful? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-03-14 23:10 -0400
csiph-web