Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242945

Re: Windows 7 versus XP, malware

Show all headers | View raw

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes:

>    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/windows-vista-and-windows-7-more-at-risk-than-xp-says-microsoft-9342509.html
>
>    Computers running either Windows 7 or Windows Vista operating systems are
>    more likely to be infected by malware than Windows XP machines, according
>    to a recent report by Microsoft.
>
>    The company’s biannual Security Intelligence Report (SIR) included
>    figures showing that in the last quarter of 2013, Windows XP computers
>    had an infection rate of 2.42 per cent, compared to 3.24 per cent for
>    Windows Vista and 2.59 per cent for Windows 7.
>
> There's more to the story, of course.

Creepy, while we all realise you're trying too hard to suck up and make
yourself a niche in the "advocate circle", I distinctly remember you, a
QA engineer for Windows closed source proprietary licensed SW that
provides an income you actively boasted about here, saying that "we are
not interested in Microsoft here".

Why are you such a spineless, sycophantic, hypocritical little weenie?


-- 
"I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." 
The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree.
PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Windows 7 versus XP, malware Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 08:03 -0400
  Re: Windows 7 versus XP, malware Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 14:33 +0200
    Re: Windows 7 versus XP, malware Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:14 -0700

csiph-web