Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #242942
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Windows 7 versus XP, malware |
| Date | 2014-05-10 08:03 -0400 |
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <lkl4is$lbo$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/windows-vista-and-windows-7-more-at-risk-than-xp-says-microsoft-9342509.html Computers running either Windows 7 or Windows Vista operating systems are more likely to be infected by malware than Windows XP machines, according to a recent report by Microsoft. The company’s biannual Security Intelligence Report (SIR) included figures showing that in the last quarter of 2013, Windows XP computers had an infection rate of 2.42 per cent, compared to 3.24 per cent for Windows Vista and 2.59 per cent for Windows 7. There's more to the story, of course. -- I'll give you my opinion of the human race in a nutshell ... their heart's in the right place, but their head is a thoroughly inefficient organ. -- W. Somerset Maugham, "The Summing Up"
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Windows 7 versus XP, malware Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-05-10 08:03 -0400
Re: Windows 7 versus XP, malware Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 14:33 +0200
Re: Windows 7 versus XP, malware Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-05-10 16:14 -0700
csiph-web