Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #34111
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: RFC: TypeScript Content |
| Date | 2017-10-16 00:01 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87h8v0583d.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <98e712be-f8fc-4f38-be66-2bbd9590fd2e@googlegroups.com> |
"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> writes: > Would the community agree that TypeScript can be considered on-topic > for the group? Given the quiet nature of the group, I would have no problem with that. > Unlike CoffeeScript and friends, TypeScript is a STRICT superset of > the current ECMAScript standard. Since all of them result in comparison with the ECMAScript standard, I would not have a problem with either of them. The trouble would come with "what's wrong with this code?" or "what's the proper way to do this in X" because both might suffer from a lack of expertise here. -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RFC: TypeScript Content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2017-10-15 15:31 -0700 Re: RFC: TypeScript Content Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-10-16 00:01 +0100 Re: RFC: TypeScript Content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-10-16 22:15 +0200
csiph-web