Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #34110 > unrolled thread

RFC: TypeScript Content

Started by"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
First post2017-10-15 15:31 -0700
Last post2017-10-16 22:15 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript


Contents

  RFC: TypeScript Content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2017-10-15 15:31 -0700
    Re: RFC: TypeScript Content Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-10-16 00:01 +0100
    Re: RFC: TypeScript Content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-10-16 22:15 +0200

#34110 — RFC: TypeScript Content

From"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com>
Date2017-10-15 15:31 -0700
SubjectRFC: TypeScript Content
Message-ID<98e712be-f8fc-4f38-be66-2bbd9590fd2e@googlegroups.com>
Would the community agree that TypeScript can be considered on-topic for the group?

Unlike CoffeeScript and friends, TypeScript is a STRICT superset of the current ECMAScript standard.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#34111

FromBen Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Date2017-10-16 00:01 +0100
Message-ID<87h8v0583d.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
In reply to#34110
"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> writes:

> Would the community agree that TypeScript can be considered on-topic
> for the group?

Given the quiet nature of the group, I would have no problem with that.

> Unlike CoffeeScript and friends, TypeScript is a STRICT superset of
> the current ECMAScript standard.

Since all of them result in comparison with the ECMAScript standard, I
would not have a problem with either of them.

The trouble would come with "what's wrong with this code?" or "what's
the proper way to do this in X" because both might suffer from a lack
of expertise here.

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#34115

FromThomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Date2017-10-16 22:15 +0200
Message-ID<1807678.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de>
In reply to#34110
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> Would the community agree that TypeScript can be considered on-topic for
> the group?
> 
> Unlike CoffeeScript and friends, TypeScript is a STRICT superset of the
> current ECMAScript standard.

ACK.

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript


csiph-web