Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #126522

Re: Good C compiler for WIN64

From Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Good C compiler for WIN64
Date 2018-02-10 17:36 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87h8qon3w5.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <00ffC.556298$5k2.137820@fx12.am4> <p5kavf$rh$1@dont-email.me> <3_BfC.534010$dh6.506913@fx42.am4> <87mv0gonlw.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <FSEfC.498781$1t7.88805@fx03.am4>

Show all headers | View raw

bartc <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

> On 10/02/2018 15:44, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> bartc <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>> <snip>
>>> In Windows, Pelles C is a C compiler that comes with include files,
>>> libraries, a C compiler and linker.
>>>
>>> The same with lccwin.
>>>
>>> The same with DMC.
>>>
>>> The same with Tiny C.
>>>
>>> So far, everyone understands exactly what these products are, what
>>> their scope is, and what they can do (some might come with an optional
>>> IDE). The dividing line between the OS and these products is also very
>>> clear.
>>>
>>> Now introduce MingW. And Msys and Msys2 and Cygwin and POSIX and all
>>> this other stuff. Now everything is a sprawling mess.
>>
>> So don't use it.  I don't see what the problem is.
>
> The problem is people saying it's simple when it isn't.

OK.  Maybe that's just a difference over the word.  Does it really
matter now that you'd said you don't consider it simple?  Is there any
more than can be useful said?

>>   And it's all open source,
>
> Seriously?

Yes, that's a true fact as far as I know.

> Just the source bundle of gcc is nearly 100,000 files. And I have no
> idea how many relate to Mingw; neither 'all' nor 'none' would be a
> surprising answer.
>
> I don't know about you, but to me, 100,000 files (I think nearly half
> were .c and .h files), is a big project. I wouldn't have a clue where
> to start even building it as it is.

OK, so you can't re-package it how you want (and I don't think anyone
said this part is simple).

>> What I don't get is the complaining about stuff.  How does it hurt you
>> that someone packaged these things up in a way that you don't like?
>> Re-do it or walk away.
>
> I am actually re-doing parts, but as completely different
> implementations.

Great.  Will it be free and/or open source too?

(I think I would have spent the time helping an existing project like
tcc to be more to my liking.  Many of the changes would surely benefit
the project as whole.  Maybe there was nothing you could take as a
starting point.)

> My C compiler was never a serious product, but is usable (it can act
> as a drop-in replacement for gcc for most of my projects) and shows
> how tidily such a program /could/ be packaged.

Did anyone doubt that?

-- 
Ben.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Good C compiler for WIN64 shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) - 2018-02-07 11:14 +1200
  Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-07 14:04 +0100
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-02-07 09:52 -0800
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 18:24 +0000
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) - 2018-02-07 16:10 +1200
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-07 13:48 +0000
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-08 01:41 -0600
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2018-02-08 01:44 -0600
  Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-02-07 21:18 +0100
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) - 2018-02-08 08:22 +1200
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-08 10:40 +0000
  Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 00:06 +0800
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 shinobi@f153.n1.z21.fsxnet (shinobi) - 2018-02-08 08:21 +1200
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-08 10:36 +0000
        Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-02-08 03:49 -0800
  Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Robbie Hatley <loneSNIPwolf@wellCUT.com> - 2018-02-08 03:22 -0800
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-02-08 04:05 -0800
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-08 12:32 +0000
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-08 12:40 +0000
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-08 14:36 +0100
        Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Robbie Hatley <loneSNIPwolf@wellCUT.com> - 2018-02-08 09:47 -0800
          Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 already5chosen@yahoo.com - 2018-02-08 10:33 -0800
          Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-09 10:33 +0100
            Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-09 10:48 +0000
              Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-09 11:18 +0000
              Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-09 15:24 +0100
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 12:56 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 15:44 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 16:13 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 17:36 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 18:15 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 18:27 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 18:42 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 20:03 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 20:23 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 20:58 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 21:13 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 21:40 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 22:22 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 23:39 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-11 01:07 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-11 01:23 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-11 01:38 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-11 01:42 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-11 10:58 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2018-02-11 03:17 -0800
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-11 11:33 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-11 14:21 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-11 15:05 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-11 17:08 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-12 22:32 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-10 18:26 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-10 20:02 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2018-02-10 14:45 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-10 16:42 +0100
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2018-02-11 08:16 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-11 13:48 +0100
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2018-02-11 15:42 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2018-02-11 18:44 +0100
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2018-02-12 15:39 +0000
                Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-02-11 16:26 +0100
              Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2018-02-10 09:50 +1300
      Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2018-02-08 12:21 -0800
        Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2018-02-08 22:52 +0000
          Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2018-02-09 10:01 -0800
  Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2018-02-08 20:16 +0100
    Re: Good C compiler for WIN64 Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2018-02-08 19:58 +0000

csiph-web