Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: Halting problem erroneously defined |
| Date | 2021-07-17 01:29 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87h7gtok9f.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <r9idnbhmfZqRI239nZ2dnUU7-V_NnZ2d@giganews.com> <87im1brtin.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <NNOdnR_Oys-eR239nZ2dnUU7-aPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <87czrjrpsn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <UrudnVe7N9H2b239nZ2dnUU7-bPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
> On 7/15/2021 8:49 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 7/15/2021 7:29 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/15/2021 5:06 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>> olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is the same freaking pathological self-reference(olcott 2004) as
>>>>>>> the liar paradox:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter Olcott Sep 5, 2004, 11:21:57 AM
>>>>>> The halting problem is not like the liar paradox in that every program P
>>>>>> either does or does not halt when given input I.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is exactly like the liar paradox in one crucial way:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Liar paradox is neither true nor false because both true and false
>>>>> values are contradicted.
>>>> No. If you've forgotten, just go back and read any of the posts I've
>>>> made over the last 16 years where I explain why that analogy is a false
>>>> one. I used to repeat myself in case some innocent reader might take
>>>> you seriously, but I think all students reading this group will be able
>>>> to tell that you are, well, let's just say "confused".
>>>
>>> The aspect that in both cases their Boolean value is contradicted is
>>> the key analogous aspect.
>>
>> You are deliberately vague about "the aspect" since you know full well
>> that every instance of the halting problem has a correct yes/no answer
>> which seems to be very different to the liar paradox.
>
> "This sentence is not true"
> If the Liar Paradox is true that makes it true that it is not true AKA false.
>
> If the Liar paradox is false that makes not true that it is not true AKA true.
>
> If the C equivalent of the Strachey (1965) CPL returns true(halts) to
> P then P loops. If it returns false(does not halt) to P then P halts.
>
> void P(u32 x)
> {
> if (H(x, x))
> HERE: goto HERE;
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> Output("Input_Halts = ", H((u32)P, (u32)P));
> }
>
> The self-contradiction of the halting problem counter-examples is
> apparently modeled after the liar paradox.
P(P) (like all computations) either halts or it does not. You tell us
it halts. You also tell up that H(P,P) == 0. H(P,P) == 0 is the wrong
answer for a halting computation.
> I continue to hope against hope that you simply misunderstand this and
> will eventually agree that I am correct.
I merely don't like your analogy. Are there any facts in dispute? I
think not. If you find that the liar paradox helps to explain why your
H gets the wrong answer, then have at it.
> The problem with that is that you simply ignore perfect clarity
> because perfect clarity is inconsistent with your goal of rebuttal:
The facts of the matter are not in dispute. For F to be a halt decider,
F(P, I) should be true iff P(I) halts and false otherwise. Your H has
H(P,P) == false when P(I) halts.
Why you are wrong can be summed up in less then three lines stating just
a few of facts that you don't dispute.
--
Ben.
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-15 18:22 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 12:42 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-15 18:48 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-15 19:00 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 13:04 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-15 19:09 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 13:17 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 13:01 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2021-07-15 20:08 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 15:57 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-15 23:06 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 18:00 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 01:29 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 19:59 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 02:49 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-15 21:43 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-17 11:05 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-18 02:36 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-19 10:09 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-19 08:18 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-20 01:38 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-20 09:29 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-20 09:17 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-21 01:28 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-17 21:57 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 13:25 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 08:56 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 13:33 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 09:28 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-16 14:44 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-16 16:39 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 12:13 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 18:26 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 12:41 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2021-07-16 19:37 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-16 11:53 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 13:39 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-16 12:52 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 14:40 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-16 13:57 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 15:09 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-16 14:30 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 16:06 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-16 16:09 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 17:24 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined André G. Isaak <agisaak@gm.invalid> - 2021-07-16 16:48 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-17 10:22 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-17 22:24 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-17 22:09 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 13:51 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 14:57 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 16:34 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-16 18:25 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> - 2021-07-16 19:29 +0100
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-16 18:59 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 14:42 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 14:22 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 14:33 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-16 20:19 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 15:34 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-16 21:30 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 16:57 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-17 09:39 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined [AM] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined [AM] Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> - 2021-07-17 17:41 +0000
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined [AM] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-17 13:26 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-16 14:37 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-17 22:28 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-07-16 13:31 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-17 22:06 -0600
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined wij <wyniijj@gmail.com> - 2021-07-17 03:01 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@gmail.com> - 2021-07-19 07:35 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-19 15:45 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-19 20:44 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Charlie-Boo <shymathguy@gmail.com> - 2021-07-19 07:43 -0700
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2021-07-19 15:49 -0500
Re: Halting problem erroneously defined Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-07-19 20:46 -0700
csiph-web