Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair |
| Subject | Re: The C64 is crap! |
| Followup-To | comp.sys.cbm |
| Date | 2016-01-21 18:05 -0500 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <8760ymwn1k.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> (permalink) |
| References | <n73r6p$rkd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <jfi.56A14E27.42.fortytwo@xs4all.nl> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.sys.cbm
Jan van den Broek wrote on 21. January 2016: > > Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:28:50 +0100 > "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> schrieb: >>The Spectrum has much better graphics and better games! > > Ah yes, the annual cross-posting flame-bait. Good. > > (Next time try to be a bit more original and start an > "VIC-20 vs ZX-81"-thread) What about Atari 8bit (400, 800 and so on) VS Commodore 64? ;-) The C64 and Amiga were the only "home computers" I owned. Now and then I try to emulate computers I never had, never even heard of until now. When I tried the Atari 800 and loaded VisiCalc (went down to some serious business ;-) I noticed it would boot from the disk after power-on. Is that true that the Atari did this or just a convenient feature of the emulator? For the C64 you had to load any program manually. -- Andreas I use a Unix based operating system, which means I get laid almost as often as I have to reboot my computer.
Back to comp.sys.cbm | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The C64 is crap! "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> - 2016-01-12 22:28 +0100
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-13 13:17 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Robert.Wolfe@f18.n116.z1.fidonet.org (Robert Wolfe) - 2016-01-12 20:33 +1200
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-13 18:17 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-13 18:10 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 13:39 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-14 17:24 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-15 13:11 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk - 2016-01-15 08:58 -0800
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-15 16:05 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-16 12:35 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:32 +0000
Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:36 +0000
Re: The C64 is crap! Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2016-01-13 10:09 +0100
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 13:42 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:37 +0000
Re: The C64 is crap! Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-13 03:44 -0800
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 10:33 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-01-14 06:10 +0800
Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:35 +0000
Re: The C64 is crap! Guesser <alistair@zxnet.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 15:24 +0000
Re: The C64 is crap! Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-21 22:31 +0100
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-21 18:05 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Drew.Klenotic@f1701.n2215.z1.fidonet.org (Drew Klenotic) - 2016-01-22 20:42 +1200
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-23 15:21 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-24 10:06 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-24 10:08 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-24 18:10 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-25 14:09 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-30 02:33 +0100
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 18:16 +1300
Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-30 14:54 -0500
Re: The C64 is crap! Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2016-02-01 10:36 +0200
Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Drew.Klenotic@f1701.n2215.z1.fidonet.org (Drew Klenotic) - 2016-01-26 19:45 +1200
Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Drew.Klenotic@f1701.n2215.z1.fidonet.org (Drew Klenotic) - 2016-01-26 19:38 +1200
Re: The C64 is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-29 23:12 +0100
Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 12:39 +1300
Re: The C64 is junk! nospam.Ed.Vance@f1.n770.z1437.fidonet.org (Ed Vance) - 2016-02-18 10:23 +1200
Re: The C64 is junk! Andreas Kohlbach <febr.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-02-19 15:57 -0500
The C64 is crap! Terry Raymond <traymond20@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:19 -0800
csiph-web