Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #239997
| From | Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA |
| Date | 2014-04-24 17:43 +0200 |
| Organization | gnu |
| Message-ID | <8738h2bunl.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <brq0k8F69k7U1@mid.individual.net> <lj8k1q$3na$1@dont-email.me> <8761lzvus6.fsf@gmail.com> <brsjljFn28mU1@mid.individual.net> <ljban3$q0g$1@dont-email.me> |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> writes: > Ian Hilliard wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On 24/04/14 13:20, Hadron wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: >>> >>> <moronic drivel snipped> >> >> I love how you Microsoft True Believers love to display your ignorance >> in public. In the world of true software engineering, platform is not a >> requirement. It is a dependent variable. People, who make the mistake of >> making it a requirement often fall all over the results of their >> decision, when their chosen platform cannot do what is required. A >> common form of this is the need to do some hack in Windows using an >> undocumented interface, because the OS was actually the wrong choice for >> the task. Then suddenly, surprise surprise, the next set of patches from >> Microsoft breaks things. This is because the developers shouldn't have >> been using those undocumented interfaces anyway. >> >> This also goes back to proper decision making methodology. A decision >> should be made using the best available information. The problem is that >> often some critical pieces of information are simply not available. This >> is where assumptions come in to play. People make logical assumptions >> often based on experience. A common form of reasoning behind the >> assumption is the belief that if it works for A then it must work for B. >> I have seen such assumptions being made, even where A and B bear no >> resemblance to each other. >> >> The problem with assumptions is that they may or may not be correct. I >> have however seen too many such assumptions taken for gospel. Under >> such circumstances, assumption is likely to lead to disaster. Put >> another way, "Assumption is the mother of all fsck-ups." >> >> If development is made on the basis that the platform could be changed, >> it opens up access to a number of different tools for testing. It also >> forces the developers to use the OS abstraction layer that has been >> chosen and in turn stops the developers from using OS specific hacks. If >> the chosen OS turns out to be usable, then the application is also >> likely to survive updates. If the OS turns out not to be suitable, then >> it can be changed. This is good engineering and a key to good project >> management. >> >> I know that all the wintrolls in this group are poo-pooing this posting, >> as it does not agree with the evangelical training they have received >> from Redmond. It is however the best way to stop from painting oneself >> into a technological corner. > > The two responders to your posts are swine. Plonkworthy. Yet he's posting here about MCSE etc? Maybe you could call us "cunts" and "fuckheads" again you simpering little weenie. Or maybe show us with assembler how Peter's crap code was really world class? Or maybe lick Hilliard's arse about his claims that he designs, implements and tests world class SW before deciding what platform it sell it on? Ahlstrom : you're a twit. Out and out twit. -- "I have a BSEE.... Negative feedback has many benefits, but "maintaining stability" is not one of them. Just the opposite, in fact." The turdv/chrisv idiot and his pretend BSEE degree. PLEASE VISIT OUR HALL OF LINUX IDIOTS http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2014-04-23 16:22 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-23 10:51 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-23 11:04 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-23 18:06 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-23 18:14 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 13:20 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2014-04-24 15:59 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-24 11:30 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 17:43 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-24 12:04 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-24 12:38 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-24 10:42 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-24 22:26 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 14:00 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-25 14:41 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-25 07:55 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-25 09:25 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-25 08:40 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 09:55 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 16:03 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2014-04-25 14:21 +0000
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-25 11:41 -0600
"Hadron" basically admits Windows is "lowest common denominator" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-25 09:24 -0400
Re: "Hadron" basically admits Windows is "lowest common denominator" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-25 08:54 -0700
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-29 19:47 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-30 08:39 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-30 10:13 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-30 10:19 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-30 10:31 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-30 10:34 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-30 12:31 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 17:04 -0700
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2014-04-25 17:44 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-25 11:01 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-29 19:33 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-30 08:00 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-30 09:12 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-30 10:05 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-25 14:07 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-25 14:22 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-25 23:57 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2014-04-28 16:01 +0200
The low road versus the high road Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-28 10:24 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-28 10:54 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 10:08 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2014-04-28 18:12 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 18:26 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 12:02 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 18:32 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2014-04-28 18:44 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 12:09 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 18:47 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-28 12:53 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 19:10 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-04-28 20:00 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 13:11 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 13:32 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 13:46 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-29 19:28 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-04-30 07:58 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 12:11 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-28 14:12 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 13:04 -0400
Re: The low road versus the high road GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 11:19 -0600
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 12:03 -0500
Re: The low road versus the high road GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 11:17 -0600
Re: The low road versus the high road Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 19:21 +0200
Re: The low road versus the high road GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2014-04-28 12:06 -0600
Re: The low road versus the high road chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-28 11:53 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-28 19:23 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-28 19:57 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 01:08 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2014-04-26 10:48 +0100
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2014-04-26 08:24 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-27 17:39 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-04-27 14:41 -0700
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-28 15:53 +0200
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-28 13:21 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Silver Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-04-23 12:52 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-23 13:26 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Benny <bt@example.net> - 2014-04-23 15:56 -0600
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-04-24 00:10 +0100
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-04-24 06:51 -0500
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2014-04-23 21:40 +0000
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-04-23 16:43 -0700
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2014-04-24 01:48 +0100
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-04-23 21:40 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-04-24 05:41 -0400
Re: Help for all the unemployed MSCEs posting in COLA Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2014-04-24 13:19 +0200
csiph-web