Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #16924
| Message-ID | <8635315.16DEVHx3j1@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-10-28 17:12 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Built-in native method |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <k5sbuj$bt8$1@speranza.aioe.org> <67583587.7BbXikoxoM@PointedEars.de> <k69jek$r9i$1@speranza.aioe.org> <3102322.j8kCu7WbkW@PointedEars.de> <k6jgm5$snj$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
> W dniu 2012-10-25 00:03, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn pisze:
> [...]
>> if (String.prototype.propertyIsEnumerable("trim"))
>
> Quick results from Google Chrome 22.0.1229.94 console.
Unreadable. What is your input, what V8's output? Which OS and platform?
> In both of cases means that object can not be enumerated by a for[...]in
> loop. And as I understand it correctly this doesn't help with determine
> if method is really built-in or not.
Possible; whether property attributes are retained is implementation-
dependent. But now that you know that *you* can overwrite
String.prototype.trim(), a solution to your problem should present itself.
> Or maybe I missed something? Hm...
Equally possible.
PointedEars
--
Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the
root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the
bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse.
-- Mike Duffy in cljs, <news:Xns9FB6521286DB8invalidcom@94.75.214.39>
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 22:07 +0200
Re: Built-in native method JJ <jaejunks_at@_googlemail_dot._com> - 2012-10-21 06:44 +0000
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-21 18:46 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-21 19:37 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2012-10-22 15:47 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-22 18:00 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-24 02:17 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-24 22:17 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-25 00:32 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-24 02:15 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-24 22:35 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-25 00:03 +0200
Re: Built-in native method Asen Bozhilov <asen.bozhilov@gmail.com> - 2012-10-26 03:58 -0700
Re: Built-in native method RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2012-10-29 16:39 -0700
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 15:32 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 17:05 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 18:39 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 20:10 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 20:23 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 21:23 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 22:03 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 15:49 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 17:12 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 17:49 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 18:07 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 19:22 +0100
Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 19:53 +0100
csiph-web