Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #16929

Re: Built-in native method

Show all headers | View raw

W dniu 2012-10-28 18:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn pisze:
> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>
>> W dniu 2012-10-28 17:12, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn pisze:
>>> Cezary Tomczyk wrote:
>>>> W dniu 2012-10-25 00:03, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn pisze:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>      if (String.prototype.propertyIsEnumerable("trim"))
>>>> Quick results from Google Chrome 22.0.1229.94 console.
>>> Unreadable.  What is your input, what V8's output?  Which OS and
>>> platform?
>>
>> OS: Windows 7
>> Platform: Win32
>
> I would consider "Windows 7 32-bit" the OS then and "Intel x86 or
> compatibles" the (hardware) platform, but I know what you mean.

Argh, my mistake. I've got platform from browser 
window.navigator.platform which is not really true. I have a Windows 7 
64-bit and "Intel x86 or compatibles".

>> Let me do in that way:
>>
>> ID - Input data in Google Chrome console
>> R - result in console
>>
>> ID:   String.prototype.propertyIsEnumerable("trim")
>> R:    false
>>
>> ID:   String(String.prototype.trim);
>> R:    "function trim() { [native code] }"
>>
>> ID:   String.prototype.trim = function(){ alert('test'); return false; };
>> R:    function (){ alert('test'); return false; }
>>
>> ID:   String.prototype.trim
>> R:    function (){ alert('test'); return false; }
>>
>> ID:   String(String.prototype.trim);
>> R:    "function (){ alert('test'); return false; }"
>
> JFYI: In the Chromium/Chrome console a type conversion to String so far is
> implicit for Function instances.

A, there is no differences when I type in console:

String(String.prototype.trim);
and
String.prototype.trim

because they are always converted to string. Right?

[...]I should set
> up a test case as part of the ES Matrix.

When will be free time :-)

-- 
Cezary Tomczyk
http://www.ctomczyk.pl/

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-19 22:07 +0200
  Re: Built-in native method JJ <jaejunks_at@_googlemail_dot._com> - 2012-10-21 06:44 +0000
    Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-21 18:46 +0200
    Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-21 19:37 +0200
      Re: Built-in native method Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2012-10-22 15:47 +0200
        Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-22 18:00 +0200
          Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-24 02:17 +0100
            Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-24 22:17 +0200
              Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-25 00:32 +0200
  Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-24 02:15 +0100
    Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-24 22:35 +0200
      Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-25 00:03 +0200
        Re: Built-in native method Asen Bozhilov <asen.bozhilov@gmail.com> - 2012-10-26 03:58 -0700
          Re: Built-in native method RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2012-10-29 16:39 -0700
        Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 15:32 +0100
          Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 17:05 +0100
            Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 18:39 +0100
              Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 20:10 +0100
                Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 20:23 +0100
                Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 21:23 +0100
                Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 22:03 +0100
        Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 15:49 +0100
          Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 17:12 +0100
            Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 17:49 +0100
              Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 18:07 +0100
                Re: Built-in native method Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2012-10-28 19:22 +0100
                Re: Built-in native method Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-10-28 19:53 +0100

csiph-web