Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #380994

Re: Observer in the double slit experiment

Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Date	2016-04-05 11:55 -0700
References	(2 earlier) <boKdnWlzh4vrs57KnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> <dmgrckF4ssuU1@mid.individual.net> <570360EC.5B3D@ix.netcom.com> <670ec7dc-781c-417a-ad8a-7d973fe1d109@googlegroups.com> <55f72d00-cb8f-431c-9dc2-6a49d82508da@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<82b0983e-449f-4f7e-ae4c-78b0e4dcf482@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Observer in the double slit experiment
From	dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Dear David Fuller:

On Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 8:31:15 AM UTC-7, David Fuller wrote:
> 8:54 AM dlzc
...
>> It has been done with buckminsterfullerene, and
>> molecules even larger than that.  But not with
>> bullets. 
> 
> Yep ... And all those things are surrounded by electrons.

As is the material of the slits.  Except when they produced interference with large molecules, they use light beams for the "material" of the slits, so the charge argument largely vaporizes.

David A. Smith

Thread

Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 05:48 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment rotchm <rotchm@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 06:45 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2016-04-04 06:56 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 07:11 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 11:07 -0500
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 10:56 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 13:53 -0500
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-04-04 22:18 -0500
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-04-05 13:57 +1000
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-04 23:53 -0700
          Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 06:54 -0700
            Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:31 -0700
              Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:47 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 08:57 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:19 -0700
                Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:31 -0700
              Re: Observer in the double slit experiment dlzc <dlzc1@cox.net> - 2016-04-05 11:55 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment RichD <r_delaney2001@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-04 11:15 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 09:59 -0700
    Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:27 -0700
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:48 -0700
      Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:19 -0700
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:27 -0700
        Re: Observer in the double slit experiment David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-05 11:41 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:04 -0700
  Re: Observer in the double slit experiment Adrian Ferent <adrferent@gmail.com> - 2016-04-05 10:25 -0700

csiph-web