Groups > sci.electronics.design > #462638

Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die

From	krw@notreal.com
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die
Message-ID	<7vb1jc96dn3e2chs41jgnhvk86sa7od36a@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <gs51jc5ss5e4514a580nsolrffub5v81g2@4ax.com> <58b95d79-d774-4d0c-ba35-c0005b3d92cf@googlegroups.com> <d371jclk08q6bfebaihvcbp94e4a8kdfg3@4ax.com> <38d9fef5-ee82-4618-8990-a7753a975f8e@googlegroups.com> <lnb1jct5aehn43r00v3bjv4ml5dh749194@4ax.com>
Organization	Forte - www.forteinc.com
Date	2017-06-01 20:24 -0400

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 20:20:32 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

>On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:47:07 -0700 (PDT), Klaus Kragelund
><klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Datasheet:
>>
>>http://www.gsense.com.cn/Uploadfiles/20144241734995881.pdf
>>
>>Price = 0.3 USD in volume, at least 25% cheaper than the STM32
>
>Where?
>>
>>The process is split, so one is logic and SRAM. The other is flash. Always cheaper to separate technologies 
>
>That's certainly not true.  If it were, there wouldn't be mixed
>technology chips.
>
>>Operation from SRAM draws less current 
>
>Not buying it, at least reads (operation).  Note that both are zero
>wait-states so no advantage there.

BTW, the datasheet claims 3MB "on-chip" flash?  That's not what we
were discussing (and *really* hard to believe).  I shoulda checked the
date on the datasheet (4/1? ;).

Thread

Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-05-31 16:08 -0700
  Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-05-31 19:22 -0400
    Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-31 23:27 -0700
      Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 12:58 -0400
        Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-06-01 10:14 -0700
          Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 14:56 -0400
            Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 18:21 -0400
              Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-06-01 15:37 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 18:40 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> - 2017-06-01 15:55 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 19:03 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-01 16:47 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-01 16:51 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die pcdhobbs@gmail.com - 2017-06-01 17:09 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> - 2017-06-01 17:12 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 20:17 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 20:04 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:13 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 11:21 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 09:51 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 10:01 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 13:38 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-02 10:47 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:22 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-02 12:36 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-06-02 15:54 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 20:20 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-01 20:24 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:19 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 12:47 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 09:56 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 17:35 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 15:43 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 18:58 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2017-06-02 16:27 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 19:31 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-03 15:09 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-03 20:35 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> - 2017-06-01 20:10 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:22 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 12:50 -0400
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die klaus.kragelund@gmail.com - 2017-06-02 01:24 -0700
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-06-02 15:38 +0200
                Re: Reliability of microcontroller silicon die glue on top of another die krw@notreal.com - 2017-06-02 12:51 -0400

csiph-web