Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534260
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals |
| Date | 2015-11-20 22:00 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <7oh4ic-c5.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <ANmdnesIQpkiptLLnZ2dnUU7-Y_OydjZ@giganews.com> <i834ic-atr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <pcidnf-qq5qj_NLLnZ2dnUU7-f0AAAAA@giganews.com> <g354ic-s4s.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <pcidnfiqq5rw8tLLnZ2dnUU7-f2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/15 12:24 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 11/20/15 11:52 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Everything evolves: >>>>> >>>>> o radioactive atoms >>>>> o our cells >>>>> o bacteria >>>>> o our bodies >>>>> o our species >>>>> o frogs >>>>> o wheat >>>>> o life on earth >>>>> o the earth >>>>> o the sun >>>>> o the solar system >>>>> o the galaxy >>>>> o the galactic cluster >>>>> o the universe (increasing entropy) >>>> >>>> Nope; a lot of things degenerate, and a lot of the things on your list do. >>>> >>> >>> Degeneration is part of evolution--you are born, evolve and die. >> >> Nope. >> >> evolve: to change or develop slowly often into a better, more complex, or >> more advanced state >> >> Perhaps the word you are looking for is change. >> >> All things change, some things evolve, some things degenerate. >> >> > > Nevertheless the sun is evolving and so are you. You will evolve until > you are dead. So you don't agree with using standard English and make up the meaning of words as you sse fit? Both the Sun and my body are in the early stages of decay, not evolution. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 19:35 -0600
Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 18:13 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals pnalsing@gmail.com - 2015-11-19 18:30 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 19:17 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 19:26 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:26 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 07:35 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 11:43 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 17:52 +0000
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 12:06 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 10:30 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 14:07 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 14:12 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 16:57 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 15:28 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:34 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:35 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 18:24 +0000
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 13:07 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 11:40 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 22:00 +0000
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 14:05 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 07:39 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 06:04 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 07:08 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 11:41 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-11-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:27 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:43 -0800
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 12:05 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 11:39 -0600
Re: Early galaxies more efficient at making stars, Hubble survey reveals "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:39 -0800
csiph-web