Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550675

Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2016-02-05 07:11 -0800
References (1 earlier) <baab8eac-0638-4284-b3d6-f498572479ec@googlegroups.com> <d5a3c62a-d2af-4cde-bac0-62b655035403@googlegroups.com> <AdGdnfmB8IQXei7LnZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> <4b2e512f-0a8d-425e-8473-74d7791fee62@googlegroups.com> <n92d73$lu2$1@pcls7.std.com>
Message-ID <6b2ed718-7692-49e2-aeff-79fa332a3181@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish
From john <johnsefton288@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

So- diamagnetism works how?
You are basing the atom on randomness,
so how can it exhibit diamagnetism or
have its electrons' periods measured
(they are doing that, Michael), or even
remain neutral- there would be huge
fluctuations in its fields.

QM is the champion of "we don't know,
we can't know". QM is total hogwash, designed 
to keep us stagnant

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:38 -0600
  Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-03 22:18 +0000
  Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:25 -0800
    Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:51 -0800
      Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 18:30 -0600
  Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 15:00 -0800
    Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 15:15 -0800
      Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 18:06 -0600
        Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-02-04 21:07 -0600
        Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 19:47 -0800
          Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 03:39 -0800
          Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-05 14:56 +0000
            Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:11 -0800
              Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:18 -0600
              Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:31 -0600
            Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:04 -0800
              Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 11:56 -0800
              Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-06 05:58 +0000
                Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 01:25 -0800
                Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-02-07 04:58 +0000
                Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:42 -0800
  Re: Fastest Light Pulses Show Electrons Are Sluggish "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 13:08 -0800

csiph-web