Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > news.groups.proposals > #4195
| From | noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | news.groups.proposals |
| Subject | Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? |
| Date | 2026-08-30 16:20 -0400 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
| Message-ID | <6a939616$1@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
| References | <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <87v78tc0th.fsf@debian> |
On Fri, 28 Aug 2026 18:58:49 -0400, Kragen Javier Sitaker wrote: > This seems like a no-brainer to me: obviously a good idea. The > *absence* of comp.lang.rust makes the comp.* hierarchy appear > nonfunctional. Rust is one of the currently most important programming Rubbish, and the level of traffic in perl, C, php related or semi-related groups, relevant traffic anyway, for the past year would take all of 10 minutes to read. (rust or the devs of certain open source projects relying on it) are incapable of backward version compatibity for more than 1 or 2 rust releases - /me looks at talos (again it just might be Michah and crew and not rust in general, but rust is where the builds fail) > languages, and although there are centralized companies like Reddit with > popular Rust forums, Usenet has advantages that those companies never > will. > > Kragen That said I would support the creation of such a group. We then have an uncensored way we can all directly vent at the right people, as typical forums go, they want to be seen as a happy happy joy joy, an all roses place removing serious negativity, I've seen on IRC people complaining at the short compat times saying they got deleted and banned (no wasn't me for once haha I took my issue up with Talso directly in email as clamav was the only software that is affected for me - the rust version was 9 months old and caused build failures as they wanted rust version that was released 3 months earlier, so again, probably Talos coding choices)...
Back to news.groups.proposals | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 07:46 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 08:43 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-13 14:49 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-13 15:54 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-14 14:11 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-14 18:06 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? NewsGroups Are Dead <noreply@invalid.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-11 08:12 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-11 16:54 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-13 14:50 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Tristan Miller <tmiller@big-8.org> - 2025-03-14 16:30 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Tristan Miller <tmiller@big-8.org> - 2025-03-14 16:20 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-14 17:32 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-09 20:49 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Steve Bonine <spb@pobox.com> - 2025-04-10 19:53 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.meow.org.invalid> - 2025-04-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Beej Jorgensen <beej@beej.us> - 2025-03-11 16:54 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-28 18:58 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-08-29 04:46 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-08-29 14:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-30 16:20 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-30 16:20 -0400
Re: Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? ReK2 Hispagatos <rek2@usenet_reborn.tui> - 2026-08-31 13:30 -0400
csiph-web