Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671377

Re: Technical details

From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Technical details
Date 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700
Organization The Starmaker Organization
Message-ID <6A49FFA6.2AE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
References <18bd81f76f4d1a73$215267$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <1123iiu$219ku$1@dont-email.me> <nap39uFgdj2U1@mid.individual.net> <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <nau524Fa3e8U3@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am Samstag000004, 04.07.2026 um 21:21 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > Thomas Heger wrote:
> >>
> >> Am Mittwoch000001, 01.07.2026 um 19:33 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
> >>> Den 29.06.2026 11:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
> >>>> Well, I'm an engineer.
> >>>
> >>> Then you know that "time" is what we measure with clocks.
> >>
> >> that's nonsense, since 'is' (in the statement above) means:
> >>
> >> the 'thing' we call 'time' would depend on clocks.
> >>
> >> But that is absolutely untrue.
> >>
> >> That would be equivalent to:
> >> 'the quantity length' would depend on yardsticks.
> >>
> >> Instead:
> >> we have something that we call 'time', which can be measured with clocks
> >> (and other devices). But time does not depend on clocks (because clocks
> >> are man-made device), but is created as a feature of nature.
> >>
> >> Our aim is now NOT the measurement of time, but to find out, why and how
> >> nature is able to maintain this feature
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> TH
> >
> >
> > 'In the beginning, ...'
> >
> > Nature
> > is able
> > to maintain
> > this feature..
> > from the very beginning.
> >
> > The Sun
> > The Moon
> >
> 
> Not quite:
> 
> Our solar system is just a little older than a few billion years, while
> the universe itself about three times older (allegedly).
> 
> TH

The earth and the universe were both created ...at the same time.



'Science' just pretend they know the exact dates...but they are just
lying.

and then there was...light.

-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-29 11:05 +0200
  Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-01 19:33 +0200
    Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-01 21:56 +0200
      Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 13:09 +0200
        Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 14:11 +0200
          Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 15:23 +0200
            Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 15:56 +0200
              Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 18:57 +0200
                Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 19:10 +0200
    Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-03 08:31 +0200
      Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-03 10:21 +0200
      Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:21 -0700
        Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:34 -0700
          Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 10:01 -0700
        Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-05 06:32 +0200
          Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700

csiph-web