Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #671377
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Technical details |
| Date | 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700 |
| Organization | The Starmaker Organization |
| Message-ID | <6A49FFA6.2AE@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| References | <18bd81f76f4d1a73$215267$260416$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <1123iiu$219ku$1@dont-email.me> <nap39uFgdj2U1@mid.individual.net> <6A495D4A.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <nau524Fa3e8U3@mid.individual.net> |
Thomas Heger wrote: > > Am Samstag000004, 04.07.2026 um 21:21 schrieb The Starmaker: > > Thomas Heger wrote: > >> > >> Am Mittwoch000001, 01.07.2026 um 19:33 schrieb Paul B. Andersen: > >>> Den 29.06.2026 11:05, skrev Maciej Woźniak: > >>>> Well, I'm an engineer. > >>> > >>> Then you know that "time" is what we measure with clocks. > >> > >> that's nonsense, since 'is' (in the statement above) means: > >> > >> the 'thing' we call 'time' would depend on clocks. > >> > >> But that is absolutely untrue. > >> > >> That would be equivalent to: > >> 'the quantity length' would depend on yardsticks. > >> > >> Instead: > >> we have something that we call 'time', which can be measured with clocks > >> (and other devices). But time does not depend on clocks (because clocks > >> are man-made device), but is created as a feature of nature. > >> > >> Our aim is now NOT the measurement of time, but to find out, why and how > >> nature is able to maintain this feature > >> > >> ... > >> > >> TH > > > > > > 'In the beginning, ...' > > > > Nature > > is able > > to maintain > > this feature.. > > from the very beginning. > > > > The Sun > > The Moon > > > > Not quite: > > Our solar system is just a little older than a few billion years, while > the universe itself about three times older (allegedly). > > TH The earth and the universe were both created ...at the same time. 'Science' just pretend they know the exact dates...but they are just lying. and then there was...light. -- The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-06-29 11:05 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-01 19:33 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-01 21:56 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 13:09 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 14:11 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 15:23 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 15:56 +0200
Re: Technical details "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@paulba.no> - 2026-07-02 18:57 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-02 19:10 +0200
Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-03 08:31 +0200
Re: Technical details Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2026-07-03 10:21 +0200
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:21 -0700
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 12:34 -0700
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-05 10:01 -0700
Re: Technical details Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2026-07-05 06:32 +0200
Re: Technical details The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2026-07-04 23:54 -0700
csiph-web