Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > de.talk.tagesgeschehen > #919072

Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung

From Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De>
Newsgroups de.talk.tagesgeschehen, de.sci.electronics, de.soc.politik.misc
Subject Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung
Date 2023-11-13 15:31 +0100
Message-ID <6552334C.32EB1D70@Berger-Odenthal.De> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <65114CC3.ED9CAD3C@proton.me> <kok7f7FjddvU1@mid.individual.net> <slrnukvik1.2q7us.als@mordor.angband.thangorodrim.de> <krelscFsucvU1@mid.individual.net> <3tl92k-3p3l.ln1@hergen.spdns.de>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Hergen Lehmann wrote:
> Ein Grundprinzip der Esoterik ist, das die Wirkung der angepriesen
> Mittelchen NICHT konkret prüfbar sein darf.

Sorry, ich habe kein Ausgabeskript für sinnvoll formatierten Text. Die
Alternativen zu Bibtex wären CSV, HTML, PDF oder die TeX-Quelle zu
letzterem:

% Liste erstellt am 2023-11-13

@article{Ph17a,
 label = {McPhetres 2017},
 shorthand = {McPhetres 2017},
 presort = {MacPhetres 2017},
 key = {MacPhetres 2017},
 sortkey = {MacPhetres 2017},
 comment = {Art:Religion; Merken:; Standort:PDF;
Signatur:SocPsyPersSci08-836-McPhetres.pdf},
 author = {Jonathon McPhetres AND Miron Zuckerman},
 title = {Religious People Endorse Different Standards of Evidence When
Evaluating Religious Versus Scientific Claims},
 journal = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
 volume = {8},
 pages = {836-842},
 doi = {10.1177/1948550617691098},
 year = {2017},
 abstract = {
SocPsyPersSci08-836-Supplement.pdf\par
Recent research has begun to investigate the relationship between
religion and science. However, it remains unclear whether religious and
nonreligious people differ on the standards of evidence used when
evaluating claims in religious versus scientific contexts. Across three
studies (N = 702), we presented participants with effects that were
attributed to scientific methodology or to God and asked them to rate
how many more times an effect needs to be repeated in order to have
certainty in the outcome. Results showed that religious people requested
fewer repetitions compared to nonreligious people when an effect was
attributed to prayer, and fewer repetitions when an effect was
attributed to prayer compared to scientific methodology. Nonreligious
people were relatively consistent across conditions. These results
suggest that religious people have less stringent standards of evidence
when evaluating nonscientific claims. Directions for future research are
also discussed.\par
{\sffamily Keywords:} religion | science | evidence | repetition\par
\par}
}

@article{Pr06a,
 label = {Pronin 2006},
 shorthand = {Pronin 2006},
 presort = {Pronin 2006},
 key = {Pronin 2006},
 sortkey = {Pronin 2006},
 comment = {Art:Religion; Merken:; Standort:PDF;
Signatur:JPersSocPsy091-0218-Pronin.pdf},
 author = {Emily Pronin AND Daniel M.\ Wegner AND Kimberly McCarthy AND
Sylvia Rodriguez},
 title = {Everyday Magical Powers: The Role of Apparent Mental Causation
in the Overestimation of Personal Influence},
 journal = {Journal of Personality and Social Psychology},
 volume = {91},
 pages = {218-231},
 doi = {10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.218},
 year = {2006},
 abstract = {
These studies examined whether having thoughts related to an event
before it occurs leads people to infer that they caused the event---even
when such causation might otherwise seem magical. In Study 1, people
perceived that they had harmed another person via a voodoo hex. These
perceptions were more likely among those who had first been induced to
harbor evil thoughts about their victim. In Study 2, spectators of a
peer's basketball-shooting performance were more likely to perceive that
they had influenced his success if they had first generated positive
visualizations consistent with that success. Observers privy to those
spectators' visualizations made similar attributions about the
spectators' influence. Finally, additional studies suggested that these
results occur even when the thought-about outcome is viewed as unwanted
by the thinker and even in field settings where the relevant outcome is
occurring as part of a live athletic competition.\par
{\sffamily Keywords:} magical beliefs | causal inference |
self-perception | apparent mental causation | conscious will\par
\par}
}

@article{Th19a,
 label = {Thunström 2019},
 shorthand = {Thunström 2019},
 presort = {Thunstrom 2019},
 key = {Thunstrom 2019},
 sortkey = {Thunstrom 2019},
 comment = {Art:Aktuell; Merken:1910; Standort:PDF;
Signatur:pnas116-19797-Thunstrom.pdf},
 author = {Linda Thunström AND Shiri Noy},
 title = {The value of thoughts and prayers},
 journal = {PNAS},
 volume = {116},
 pages = {19797-19798},
 doi = {10.1073/pnas.1908268116},
 year = {2019},
 abstract = {
A standard response of both policy makers and private citizens to
hardships---from natural disasters to mass shootings---is to offer
``thoughts and prayers.'' Critics argue that such gestures are
meaningless and may obstruct structural reforms intended to mitigate
catastrophes. In this study, we elicit the value of receiving thoughts
and prayers from strangers following adversity. We find that Christians
value thoughts and prayers from religious strangers and priests, while
atheists and agnostics are ``prayer averse''---willing to pay to avoid
receiving prayers. Furthermore, while indifferent to receiving thoughts
from other secular people, they negatively value thoughts from
Christians.\par
{\sffamily Keywords:} intercessory thoughts | intercessory prayers |
willingness to pay\par
\par}
}


-- 
/¯\   No  |    Dipl.-Ing. F. Axel Berger    Tel: +49/ 221/ 7771 8067
\ /  HTML |    Roald-Amundsen-Straße 2a     Fax: +49/ 221/ 7771 8069
 X    in  |    D-50829 Köln-Ossendorf      http://berger-odenthal.de
/ \  Mail | -- No unannounced, large, binary attachments, please! --

Back to de.talk.tagesgeschehen | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de> - 2023-11-11 19:40 +0100
  Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-13 14:18 +0100
    Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.12-22@snafu.de> - 2023-11-13 14:45 +0100
      Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung Axel Berger <Spam@Berger-Odenthal.De> - 2023-11-13 15:31 +0100
      Re: Der Wermepumpen-Sub-Wahnsinn: Fufbodenheizung Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-11-14 09:44 +0100

csiph-web