Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #619694

Re: attraction field lattice...

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Paul Alsing wrote:
> 
> On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 8:58:59 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > >
> > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 5:04:58 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Paul Alsing wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:52:00 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > Like for example...Albert Einstein had autism. 1 percent of the world
> > > > > > population has autism.
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.aruma.com.au/about-us/blog/did-einstein-have-autism/
> > > > >
> > > > > "While researchers can speculate about Einstein having autism, the truth is we'll never really know. Trying to diagnose someone with autism based on biographical information is not reliable, and his behaviour could be due to a few different causes."
> > > > Oh please with your stupid talking for others: "we'll never really know."
> > > > You mean You will never know! Because you're retarded...you're in dat one percent of retards. Whats your disease?? ADHDBMG? And who is "we'll"? your momma and your poppa? your stupid wife? your stupid kid? your stupid dog? your stupid girlfriend?
> > > > (yeah, she's stupid if she's wit you.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism! I have 100 percent evidence dat Albert Einstein had autism!! The evidence I have is overwhelming!!!
> > > >
> > > > It is 100 percent irrefutable!!!!
> > >
> > > So, present your "evidence" or run away, your call... I think you shall fail.
> 
> > What do you base evidence on that proves a person has autism?
> 
> Not my job. Remember, YOU wrote here that YOU had "one hundred percent proof dat Albert Einstein had autism" and that it was "100 percent irrefutable!!!! "... and I am asking you to present that 100% proof... but, of course, you cannot do that... you just make shit up >as you go along, and I am telling you that my bullshit meter is going crazy...


Everybody here knows you are a 'strange person', and not to be trusted.


You wrote: "biographical information is not reliable"


You wrote: "behaviour could be due to a few different causes".


So, what type of diagonsics do you accept as proof or evidence of autism????


 






-- 
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, 
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 15:23 -0700
  Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:14 -0700
    Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 17:19 -0700
      Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 17:55 -0700
        Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 18:05 -0700
          Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-03 20:36 -0700
            Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:12 -0700
              Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-03 21:23 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:43 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:33 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 17:21 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:09 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 14:52 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 16:23 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 17:05 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 18:03 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:59 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 21:47 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 21:55 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:27 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 08:42 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-05 21:57 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-08 15:17 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-08 20:23 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 18:15 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 22:12 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 22:30 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 22:47 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-09 23:19 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 14:12 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-09 20:09 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-10 09:01 -0500
                Re: attraction field lattice... Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-09-05 12:44 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 18:29 -0500
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 19:29 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 21:56 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-04 18:37 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-09-04 20:51 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2023-09-05 04:18 -0400
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:56 -0700
                Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 12:33 -0700
              Re: attraction field lattice... "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2023-09-04 11:37 -0700
  Re: attraction field lattice... "mitchr...@gmail.com" <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> - 2023-09-05 11:05 -0700

csiph-web