Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #894056

Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?

Show all headers | View raw

Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> AI or Artificial Idiocy is for NI or Natural Idiots like Penisnino.
> P* keeps on demonstrating that!
> 
> WOOF woof-woof woof
> 
> Bertietaylor
> 
> --

Arindam's response here is pure invective with no content—scientific,
philosophical, or rhetorical—worth evaluating on its merits.
Breakdown:
1. Ad Hominem and Vulgar Insult

    "AI or Artificial Idiocy is for NI or Natural Idiots like Penisnino."

    This is name-calling, not argument.

    The vulgar distortion of a name signals both immaturity and an
    unwillingness to engage in civil discourse.

    No attempt is made to rebut any point raised in the original critique.

2. Empty Assertion

    "P keeps on demonstrating that!"*

    The statement is vague. "Demonstrating what?" is left unclear.

    Without evidence or specifics, this is just hollow repetition.

3. Barking Persona Again

    "WOOF woof-woof woof"

    The continued use of “Bertietaylor” and dog-barks serves no
    intellectual purpose.

    It might aim to mock or appear playful, but in the context of an
    insult-laden post, it reads as dismissive noise.

Conclusion

This is not a response to criticism. It is:

    A deliberate evasion of the critique,

    An insult masquerading as wit, and

    A sign of retreat from substantive engagement.

Evaluation:
 Content-free, juvenile, and hostile. Arindam has offered no defense of
 his views on Poincaré or anything else. If he has a position worth
 defending, this response hides it beneath bluster and bile.

-- 
penninojim@yahoo.com

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 20:57 +0200
  Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 20:58 +0200
    GitHub 2.0: The no code companion repository (Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 21:27 +0200
    Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:38 -0500
    Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:56 -0500
  Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:15 -0500
    I am not from Israel or Jewish (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-16 11:46 +0200
      Re: I am not from Israel or Jewish (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-17 22:44 -0500
        I am neither Hanson (Was: I am not from Israel or Jewish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-19 22:09 +0200
          Re: I am neither Hanson bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:32 +0000
            Was Hanson your Bed Warmer? (Was: I am neither Hanson) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 10:17 +0200
              Re: Was Hanson your Bed Warmer? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 09:42 +0000
  Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 01:36 +0000
    Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 19:55 -0700
      Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:37 +0000
        Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-18 18:47 -0700
        Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 03:47 +0000
          Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 06:29 -0700
            Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:27 +0000
              Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:25 -0700
                Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 06:53 +0000
                Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 06:01 -0700
  Latent Thinking the forbidden Fruit (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-02 12:22 +0100

csiph-web