Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #893973

GitHub 2.0: The no code companion repository (Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next)

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

Why have even a classification of code
into Python, JavaScript, Java, etc.. ?
They are just some form. Not content.

But what is content? The last 30 years
saw it that repository spurred
collaboration, because I can go home
forget everything and next morning,

first do a repo refresh and pick a
ticket and dig into something. So the
no code companion repository will do
the same, like it does now.

It will not be solely intent based.
Goals can be highly ambigious. I do
not think the future AGI based repos
will be intent based. They have to grasp

the full BDI, believe desire intent
of their users. So with a cognitive twin,
and some trust, I might even delegate some
work completely or multiply my ego a 100

times and delegate. Delegate to swarm
was always my dream.

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> So StackOverflow has already fallen, and
> GitHub will be the next one. StackOverflow
> was eclectic, insuinated a high Signal
> quality but repelled its newcomers by
> strick language rules and deletism.
> 
> StackOverlow is suplaned by ChatGPT, etc..
> They are more tolerant and can deliver
> excellent Signals, much beter than
> StackOverflow. ChatGPT and other assistants
> flipped the model: No downvotes.
> 
> No “duplicate question” shaming. Conversational,
> exploratory, and often faster than Googling +
> scanning SO threads. Most importantly: they don’t
> punish incomplete knowledge, which is where
> most human learning happens.
> 
> LLMs give a more forgiving learning curve.
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>
>> Henri Poincaré believed that mathematical
>> and scientific creativity came from a deep,
>> unconscious intuition that could not be
>>
>> captured by mechanical reasoning or formal
>> systems. He famously wrote about how insights
>> came not from plodding logic but from sudden
>>
>> illuminations — leaps of creative synthesis.
>>
>> But now we have generative AI — models like GPT — that:
>>
>> - produce poetry, proofs, stories, and code,
>>
>> - combine ideas in novel ways,
>>
>> - and do so by processing patterns in massive
>>     datasets, without conscious understanding.
>>
>> And that does seem to contradict Poincaré's belief
>> that true invention cannot come from automation.
> 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 20:57 +0200
  Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 20:58 +0200
    GitHub 2.0: The no code companion repository (Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 21:27 +0200
    Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:38 -0500
    Re: Stack Overflow is declining, and GitHub might be next (Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:56 -0500
  Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-15 15:15 -0500
    I am not from Israel or Jewish (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-16 11:46 +0200
      Re: I am not from Israel or Jewish (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-07-17 22:44 -0500
        I am neither Hanson (Was: I am not from Israel or Jewish) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-19 22:09 +0200
          Re: I am neither Hanson bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:32 +0000
            Was Hanson your Bed Warmer? (Was: I am neither Hanson) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-21 10:17 +0200
              Re: Was Hanson your Bed Warmer? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 09:42 +0000
  Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-17 01:36 +0000
    Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-16 19:55 -0700
      Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 00:37 +0000
        Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-18 18:47 -0700
        Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-19 03:47 +0000
          Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-19 06:29 -0700
            Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 00:27 +0000
              Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-20 18:25 -0700
                Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-07-21 06:53 +0000
                Re: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom? Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net> - 2025-07-21 06:01 -0700
  Latent Thinking the forbidden Fruit (Was: Would Poincaré miss the AI Boom?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-02 12:22 +0100

csiph-web