Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22015
| Message-ID | <5957377.XgIPmTjdrt@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2013-11-15 16:25 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <708973f8-8cc4-409f-b763-f1ef0d455b58@l43g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <46296233-c493-4de4-921e-2dc9c7870622@googlegroups.com> <1cb35df7-7de2-4139-a31f-100139b5c794@googlegroups.com> |
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: > On Friday, November 15, 2013 2:20:33 AM UTC-6, alje...@gmail.com wrote: >> I bloody hate this idea, someone really needs to start a petition or >> smthn to keep arguments.callee > > What are you doing that makes you reliant upon it? > > Have you read any of the history and reasoning on es-discuss yet? I think you are expecting too much of an anonymous Google poster who follows up to a five year old thread without a substantial argument. For that matter, have *you* been reading the thread in which you are posting? It has been pointed out there that there are disadvantages of _not_ using arguments.callee. At least as long as the relevant JScript versions are around. But arguments.callee is not dead, it has just been made forbidden in ES 5 strict mode. That said, since I have not been reading es-discuss either (I do not have the time), I would be grateful, and I expect other readers would, if you could provide (a) relevant URI(s). -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? aljey1972@gmail.com - 2013-11-15 00:20 -0800
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? Ry Nohryb <jorge@jorgechamorro.com> - 2013-11-15 01:05 -0800
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-11-15 06:25 -0800
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-15 16:25 +0100
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-11-15 09:50 -0800
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-11-15 21:15 -0800
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-11-16 11:31 +0000
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2013-11-17 01:35 +0700
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-11-17 11:34 -0800
Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-19 00:42 +0100
csiph-web