Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!dedibox.gegeweb.org!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Message-ID: <5957377.XgIPmTjdrt@PointedEars.de>
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de>
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:25:41 +0100
User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v
Face: 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
Subject: Re: What's wrong with arguments.callee ?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
References: <708973f8-8cc4-409f-b763-f1ef0d455b58@l43g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <46296233-c493-4de4-921e-2dc9c7870622@googlegroups.com> <1cb35df7-7de2-4139-a31f-100139b5c794@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Nov 2013 16:25:47 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 5c03cab6.newsspool1.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: DXC=NP8^H>TPDldOKO]LCQ@0g`ic==]BZ:afn4Fo<]lROoRankgeX?EC@@`BeLlkVT3cfdDZm8W4\YJNlYUVHKH;GI^gk1;Nc]Ncg]gQPG<ALQ9IQi
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:22015

Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> On Friday, November 15, 2013 2:20:33 AM UTC-6, alje...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I bloody hate this idea, someone really needs to start a petition or
>> smthn to keep arguments.callee
> 
> What are you doing that makes you reliant upon it?
>  
> Have you read any of the history and reasoning on es-discuss yet?

I think you are expecting too much of an anonymous Google poster who
follows up to a five year old thread without a substantial argument.

For that matter, have *you* been reading the thread in which you are 
posting?  It has been pointed out there that there are disadvantages of 
_not_ using arguments.callee.  At least as long as the relevant JScript 
versions are around.  But arguments.callee is not dead, it has just been 
made forbidden in ES 5 strict mode.

That said, since I have not been reading es-discuss either (I do not have 
the time), I would be grateful, and I expect other readers would, if you 
could provide (a) relevant URI(s).

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.