Groups > sci.physics > #619375

Re: the brightest stars in our constelation

Message-ID	<58A8D96F.5CDA@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date	2017-02-18 15:31 -0800
From	The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written
Subject	Re: the brightest stars in our constelation
References	<58A7E52B.2141@ix.netcom.com> <58A88805.18CC@ix.netcom.com> <58A8AAAF.6D33@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Recently, i mentioned what caused the big bang actually looked looked
> > > like..
> > >
> > > i drew a diagram of what stars looked like that caused the big bang..
> > >
> > > i mentioned that the stars were all aligned to each other...
> > >
> > > here is the illustration i posted..
> > >
> > > .    .
> > >
> > > .    .
> > >
> > > each dot is a star.
> > >
> > > each star is aligned..
> > >
> > > You can look at the night sky and see
> > > what it looked liked today..
> > >
> > > I believe yous call it the Big Dipper.
> > >
> > > It is the brightest stars in our constelation for a reason..
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> >
> > at one point in time
> > the big dipper
> > stars were aligned
> > like this
> >
> > .      .
> >
> > .      .
> >
> > but as the years passed on
> > it is traveling off..
> >
> > so it looks now...unaligned.
> 
> you have a big dipper and a little dipper...
> 
> nothing random about it.

It seems to me that both the big dipper and the little dipper are
both...missing a star. What happen to it?

Thread

the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-17 22:09 -0800
  Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 09:44 -0800
    Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 09:54 -0800
    Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 12:12 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 13:10 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 13:32 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 15:31 -0800
        Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-19 12:52 -0800
  Re: the brightest stars in our constelation Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-18 13:36 -0800
    Re: the brightest stars in our constelation "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 19:31 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-19 19:40 -0800

csiph-web