Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #619527

Re: the brightest stars in our constelation

Message-ID <58AA0585.54EF@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2017-02-19 12:52 -0800
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy, rec.arts.sf.written
Subject Re: the brightest stars in our constelation
References <58A7E52B.2141@ix.netcom.com> <58A88805.18CC@ix.netcom.com> <58A8AAAF.6D33@ix.netcom.com> <58A8D96F.5CDA@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Recently, i mentioned what caused the big bang actually looked looked
> > > > like..
> > > >
> > > > i drew a diagram of what stars looked like that caused the big bang..
> > > >
> > > > i mentioned that the stars were all aligned to each other...
> > > >
> > > > here is the illustration i posted..
> > > >
> > > > .    .
> > > >
> > > > .    .
> > > >
> > > > each dot is a star.
> > > >
> > > > each star is aligned..
> > > >
> > > > You can look at the night sky and see
> > > > what it looked liked today..
> > > >
> > > > I believe yous call it the Big Dipper.
> > > >
> > > > It is the brightest stars in our constelation for a reason..
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > at one point in time
> > > the big dipper
> > > stars were aligned
> > > like this
> > >
> > > .      .
> > >
> > > .      .
> > >
> > > but as the years passed on
> > > it is traveling off..
> > >
> > > so it looks now...unaligned.
> >
> > you have a big dipper and a little dipper...
> >
> > nothing random about it.
> 
> It seems to me that both the big dipper and the little dipper are
> both...missing a star. What happen to it?



i have to admit, i don't know either.

i just discovered it was missing...



the big dipper and the little dipper both should contain 8 stars.






                 '
            *          .    
                   *       ' 
              *                *
 



       
   *   '*
           *
                *        
                       *
               *  
                     *





There is only one explaination...both left as the same time since both were created at the same time.



but where did it go????


i'm gonna have to buy popular mechanics and buy me a telescope...i ran out of quaters at the Griffen Observatory.


This science business is killing me!



i need the quaters for the laundry...

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-17 22:09 -0800
  Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 09:44 -0800
    Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 09:54 -0800
    Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 12:12 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 13:10 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-02-18 13:32 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-18 15:31 -0800
        Re: the brightest stars in our constelation The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-02-19 12:52 -0800
  Re: the brightest stars in our constelation Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-18 13:36 -0800
    Re: the brightest stars in our constelation "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-02-19 19:31 -0800
      Re: the brightest stars in our constelation "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-02-19 19:40 -0800

csiph-web