Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #517646

Re: parallel universe

Message-ID <55E1DB1D.53B@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: parallel universe
References <JrOdnfa8LPlVOULInZ2dnUU7-Q-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <55E015E1.7C66@ix.netcom.com> <55E16581.51D4@ix.netcom.com> <charlie-gordon1492-5BCF3F.01133129082015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


je suis charly wrote:
> 
> In article <55E16581.51D4@ix.netcom.com>,
>  The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > tony wrote:
> > > >
> > > > What are some of the earliest parallel universe stories?
> > >
> > > if you're talking about books there is: The Lathe of Heaven
> > >
> > > if you're talking about other stuff stories:
> > > http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782
> >
> >
> > But what most people don't know is that..
> > parallel universe is an invention by
> > the science fiction community, not the
> > scientific community.
> 
> To be fair spacecraft also showed up first in the science fiction of Johannes
> Kepler.
> 
> > So, when I see members
> > of the 'scientific community' talking
> > about parallel universe...they are talking about
> > a subject invented by the
> > science fiction community.
> 
> It depends whether they are just speculating or if they think actually think
> there is evidence for anything outside this universe. Speculation is the
> precursor to hypothesis which begets theory.


It is a speculation that first came from science fiction community, not the 'scientific community'.

I understand it's unobservable, not tested...but doesn't even come from the 'scientific community' as a theory.

Cause it is an invention of 'the science fiction community'.

Parallel Universe is a science fiction theory, not a science non-fiction theory.


It comes from science fiction. It is borne from science fiction. 



There is no Science theory like this:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/440782

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 00:55 -0700
  Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 01:13 -0700
    Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:17 -0700
      Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 09:30 -0700
        Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-29 19:23 +0200
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-08-31 07:06 +0200
        Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 19:58 -0500
          Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 18:40 -0700
            Re: parallel universe gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:33 -0500
              Re: parallel universe je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 21:03 -0700
              Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-29 23:43 -0700
                Re: parallel universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:01 -0700
                Re: parallel universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-30 13:01 -0700
          Re: parallel universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-09-02 01:05 +0200
  Re: parallel universe "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:09 -0700

csiph-web