Re: Hello World

From	Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad
Subject	Re: Hello World
Date	2015-03-10 22:31 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<54FFA8E5.8000805@yahoo.com> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <2b776$54fdb8d8$43da7656$21646@nntpswitch.blueworldhosting.com> <mdklh0$8r7$1@dont-email.me> <mdkqd4$u3s$1@dont-email.me> <090320151507453494%nospam@nospam.invalid> <mdla9p$jeo$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/9/2015 7:28 PM, DMcCunney wrote:
...
>> python is not a good choice for apps, except maybe very simple ones.
>
> <giggle>

An eloquent rejoinder.

...
> As an example, an app used daily here is Calibre, from
> http://calibre-ebook.com.

That's an application I have used many times.  It's a sophisticated 
program with a lot of capability.

nospam:

Obviously, you're right that some programs really need to be written in 
C++.  Others really need to be written even lower in C, and there are 
some, such as hardware drivers and real-time networking, 
instrumentation, etc. programs that should sometimes be written in 
assembler.

Some big applications also require lower level tools.  I heard, for 
example, that Microsoft attempted to re-write Office in C# but gave up. 
  The performance was inadequate.

However it's as much a mistake to think that all programs should be 
written in C++ or similar languages as it was for the assembler 
die-hards to resist the incursion of PL/1, C, Pascal, etc.

The same debate was waged by some old programmers who saw no possible 
value in database management systems.  They said, "I can write a program 
to store and retrieve data by using track and sector geometry that will 
run much faster than your DBMS."  They were right.  But they couldn't 
build complex information systems much less make them portable across 
different hardware.

The general rule that the industry has adopted, rightly so I think, is 
to use the highest level, highest functionality tools available to meet 
the performance requirements of the application.

I know that shouldn't be writing this stuff, but it's fun to re-visit 
the battles waged 20 years ago - especially since I already know who the 
winners were.

    Alan

Thread

Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-07 12:53 -0600
  Re: Hello World Inge Svensson <ingesvensson@bredband.net> - 2015-03-07 19:58 +0100
  Re: Hello World Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-08 15:02 +0000
    Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 14:51 -0500
      Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-08 20:41 +0000
        Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-08 20:44 +0000
        Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 16:51 -0500
          Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 16:11 -0500
            Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 17:23 -0500
              Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-08 22:51 +0000
                Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-08 22:52 +0000
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 21:52 -0500
                Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-09 12:09 +0000
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 07:52 -0500
                Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-09 13:31 +0000
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 09:04 -0500
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 11:10 -0500
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 10:14 -0500
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 11:26 -0500
                Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-09 17:32 +0000
                Re: Hello World DMcCunney <dennis.mccunney@gmail.com> - 2015-03-09 14:57 -0400
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 15:07 -0500
                Re: Hello World Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-09 16:19 -0400
                Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-09 22:02 +0000
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 22:36 -0400
                Re: Hello World Tony Cito <tonycito@this.is.invalid> - 2015-03-10 13:23 +0000
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-10 19:50 -0400
                Re: Hello World DMcCunney <dennis.mccunney@gmail.com> - 2015-03-09 19:28 -0400
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-10 19:50 -0400
                Re: Hello World DMcCunney <dennis.mccunney@gmail.com> - 2015-03-10 20:58 -0400
                Re: Hello World Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-10 22:31 -0400
                Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-09 19:14 +0000
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 15:07 -0500
                Re: Hello World Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-09 13:56 -0400
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 15:15 -0500
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 16:19 -0500
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 15:25 -0500
                Re: Hello World Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2015-03-10 11:23 +0000
                Re: Hello World Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-09 16:37 -0400
                Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-09 21:58 +0000
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 18:09 -0500
                Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-10 23:43 +0000
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-10 19:50 -0400
                Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 15:17 -0500
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 16:19 -0500
                Re: Hello World Alan Meyer <ameyer2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-09 16:27 -0400
                Re: Hello World Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2015-03-10 15:18 +0000
                Re: Hello World Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-10 13:31 +1300
                Re: Hello World Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-10 09:29 +1300
                Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-09 16:29 -0500
                Re: Hello World Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-09 13:26 +1300
        Re: Hello World Sunshine <sunshine@my.antispam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 16:08 -0500
          Re: Hello World nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-08 17:23 -0500
      Re: Hello World Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-03-09 03:26 +0000
  Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-09 14:20 +0000
    Re: Hello World BugHunter <bughunter@com.invalid> - 2015-03-09 15:42 +0100
      Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-09 19:05 +0000
    Re: Hello World Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-09 08:12 -0700
    Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-09 17:48 +0000
      Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-09 18:30 +0000
        Re: Hello World BugHunter <bughunter@com.invalid> - 2015-03-09 19:35 +0100
      Re: Hello World Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-09 19:11 +0000
        Re: Hello World Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2015-03-10 12:16 +0000
      Re: Hello World Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-03-10 09:35 +1300
      Re: Hello World "HankG" <hgxrp@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-11 13:58 -0400

csiph-web