Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1999

Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()?

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

> The author is somewhat confused here: sigwait returns "pending signals",
> this means "signals which don't cause any 'action' because they're
> blocked", hence, no "default actions" will happen.

Thanks for your feedback.

I have just found that the section "12.8 Threads and Signals" of the book
"Advanced Programming in the UNIX® Environment" contains also a bit of
information for the requested issue. The corresponding handling might be
implementation-defined. Is any more clarification for such details possible?

Regards,
Markus

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-11-21 17:50 +0100
  Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2013-11-21 17:02 +0000
    Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2013-11-21 17:32 +0000
    Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-11-21 18:38 +0100
  Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 14:52 -0800

csiph-web