Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #1999
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.unix.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? |
| Date | Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:38:24 +0100 |
| Lines | 13 |
| Message-ID | <528E4510.6020206@web.de> (permalink) |
| References | <bf6rviFm5kiU1@mid.individual.net> <87zjox7kn9.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 6+5GpX/yM7k5lB/yMlzx2Qc2iGY46YV/BxEzn73Azhm4IECCe2 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:J/ZnwcWEfjdzRQH6gNx/I+hTN5E= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <87zjox7kn9.fsf@sable.mobileactivedefense.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:1999 comp.unix.programmer:5003 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
> The author is somewhat confused here: sigwait returns "pending signals", > this means "signals which don't cause any 'action' because they're > blocked", hence, no "default actions" will happen. Thanks for your feedback. I have just found that the section "12.8 Threads and Signals" of the book "Advanced Programming in the UNIX® Environment" contains also a bit of information for the requested issue. The corresponding handling might be implementation-defined. Is any more clarification for such details possible? Regards, Markus
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-11-21 17:50 +0100
Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2013-11-21 17:02 +0000
Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@mobileactivedefense.com> - 2013-11-21 17:32 +0000
Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> - 2013-11-21 18:38 +0100
Re: Combination of sigwait() with sigaction()? "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-11-21 14:52 -0800
csiph-web