Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #719706
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Why debate in science is dead |
| Date | 2018-12-20 19:35 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4h7tef-4pr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <069bad78-239d-4bcd-83c2-489e12690cf0@googlegroups.com> |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > Humans have a deep-seated emotional need to believe they understand their world and there is a lot of money to be made fulfilling that need. Utter nonsensense, there is much more money to be made in applied science than there is in research. >And since most science consumers More nonsense; there is no such thing as a "science consumer" or a science store. "I'll have a theorm to go and could I get that gift wrapped?" <snip remaining insane drivel> -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why debate in science is dead James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 11:32 -0800
Re: Why debate in science is dead "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 10:10 -0800
Re: Why debate in science is dead Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-20 13:21 -0600
Re: Why debate in science is dead jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-20 19:35 +0000
Re: Why debate in science is dead Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:55 -0800
csiph-web