Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #719706

Re: Why debate in science is dead

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Why debate in science is dead
Date Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:35:32 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 20
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <4h7tef-4pr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <069bad78-239d-4bcd-83c2-489e12690cf0@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="56e4b1f5ccf37ca13ce9227d60dca838"; logging-data="19597"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Y5n110+oy4fdtkerG4Fpe"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:5wFaDY4C5A2IAGAHXYvKBmi3MYc=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:719706

Show key headers only | View raw


James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Humans have a deep-seated emotional need to believe they understand their world and there is a lot of money to be made fulfilling that need.

Utter nonsensense, there is much more money to be made in applied science
than there is in research.

>And since most science consumers

More nonsense; there is no such thing as a "science consumer" or a science
store.

"I'll have a theorm to go and could I get that gift wrapped?"

<snip remaining insane drivel>



-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why debate in science is dead James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-12-13 11:32 -0800
  Re: Why debate in science is dead "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 10:10 -0800
    Re: Why debate in science is dead Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-20 13:21 -0600
  Re: Why debate in science is dead jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2018-12-20 19:35 +0000
  Re: Why debate in science is dead Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-12-20 14:55 -0800

csiph-web