Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #689352

Re: Particle physics 2

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, June 7, 2018 at 10:13:43 AM UTC-7, numbernu...@gmail.com wrote:
> The masses of the subatomic particles are measured using the curve paths of the liquid hydrogen bubble tracks within the bubble chamber that established particle physics. Initially, an accelerated proton beam is incident to an external metallic target that collision produces subatomic particles that propagate through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber and interact with the hydrogen atoms forming the hydrogen bubble tracks but the subatomic particles that have a mass cannot propagate through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber without producing a hole in the bubble chamber and causing an explosion of the liquid hydrogen. Rutherford's gold foil experiment is used to justify subatomic particles propagating through the bubble chamber but Rutherford's alpha particles cannot propagate through a quarter inch thick steel plate. Muons produced by the atmospheric decay of cosmic rays are also used to justify subatomic particles propagating through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber but a muon is 200 times more massive than an electron. A 2000 W arc welder's electron beam can cut and weld steel. A high density of high energy muons propagating through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber would result in the formation of a hole in the bubble chamber and a hydrogen explosion. The Soudan muon detector that is located at the bottom of a 1,800 meters deep mine shaft (Ayre, p. 2) is used to justify subatomic particles propagating through the steel enclosure of the bubble chamber but a muon that has a mass larger than an electron cannot propagate through more than 1,400 meters of bedrock. It is more likely that the Soudan muon detector is detecting radioactive isotopes that exist at the bottom of the former Soudan iron mine. The CERN Large Hadron Collider LHC (2017) describes a hadron (proton) beam that is accelerated using a beam pipe and superconducting magnets but a magnetic field does not accelerate protons. Using an analogy, a solenoid's magnetic force alters the position of the iron armature but solenoid's magnetic field does not affect the position of wood chips, charged dust particles or protons. The cyclotron is used to justify the acceleration of the hadron beam. The cyclotron accelerates protons and alpha particles where the cyclotron particles are accelerated using an electric potential between two halves of the cyclotron semi-circle metal apparatus but the cyclotron charged particles would be attracted to the charged semi-circle metallic apparatus preventing the acceleration of the protons or alpha particles. Using an analogy, an electron beam of an arc welder is formed when the electrons are propagating from towards a positive charged anode and collide with the positive charged surface yet the Lawence Livermore cyclotron depicts the particle beam with a blue colored light emission. The LHC experiment is based on hadron beams consisting of disassociated hydrogen gas molecules but the disassociation of hydrogen would result in an extremely unstable protons. Proton beam therapy is used to justify the existence of a proton beam but protons that have a mass 1,000 times greater than an electron would destroy human skin, bone and tissue in the path of the proton beam similar to the affects of an arch welder. It is more likely that gamma rays are producing the effects of proton beam therapy. The LHC 27 km circumference beam pipe and superconducting magnets do not accelerate the proton beam since a magnetic field effects metal objects such as a carpenter nail, paper clip or iron filings. A magnet does not affect the position of wood chips, charged dust particles or protons. The RF cavity is used to accelerate the protons but the electric field of the RF cavity would result in the protons to collided with the negative surface. It is questionable what is the purposed of the 27 km circumference beam pipe and superconducting magnets since the RF cavity is ostensibly accelerating the protons not the 27 km circumference beam pipe and magnets. It would have been much cheaper to build a series of RF cavities facing each other and eliminating the extremely expensive 27 km circumference beam pipe and superconducting magnets. The two accelerated proton beams propagate through the 27 km circumference beam pipe and are combined within the Atlas particle physics detector which is used to form the images of the two proton beam's collision that is used to justify the existence of subatomic particles but the the detector is composed of concentric metal cylinders around the interaction point where the proton beams collision occurs but the concentric cylinders are composed of metal (matter). The subatomic particles that are composed of matter cannot propagate through the detector cylinders without producing a holes in the metallic cylinders and destroying the detector.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 10:13 -0700
  Particle physics 2 john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 10:17 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:02 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 17:39 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 14:58 -0500
      Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 20:43 +0000
        Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:13 -0400
          Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 18:48 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 12:25 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:38 +0000
    Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-07 22:44 +0200
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 12:26 -0700
  Re: Particle physics 2 numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-06-07 12:27 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-07 23:06 +0200
      Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 21:47 +0000
        Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-08 04:16 +0200
  Re: Particle physics 2 Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-06-07 22:38 +0200
    Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 15:07 -0500
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 09:57 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:48 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 10:05 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 17:48 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-08 14:53 -0500
      Re: Particle physics 2 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 12:54 -0700
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 18:57 -0400
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 12:26 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 20:43 +0000
  Re: Particle physics 2 furthermore7990662@gmail.com - 2018-06-08 12:27 -0700
    Re: Particle physics 2 Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 20:43 +0000
      Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 19:10 -0400
        Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-09 19:03 -0500
          Re: Particle physics 2 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-09 22:50 -0400
            Re: Particle physics 2 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-10 21:11 -0500

csiph-web