Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #273421
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| References | (2 earlier) <op.x3r1ku0wtm21m2@benson.localhost> <359edeea07c8e8a0a049108d95ff9480@dizum.com> <op.x3r95iistm21m2@benson.localhost> <55eda04bad420c601c620e6a14c5f42b@dizum.com> <op.x3s9wpxytm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| Subject | Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming |
| Message-ID | <434d875068b503f8a2713d39d781d45e@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2015-08-23 17:48 +0200 |
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, alt.usenet.kooks, sci.physics |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.x3s9wpxytm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again on Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 04:01:27 -0400: 4:01 AM... up frothing in the wee hours again, BootFuckee? LOL > On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 16:14:10 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler > Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >> >> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.x3r95iistm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >> first into the wood chipper again: >>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:57:28 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler >>> Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> >>>> >>>> Robert M. Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop >>>> Jockey), socked up as root@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.x3r1ku0wtm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head >>>> first into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:23:03 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote >>>>> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>>> only an idiot would think that dumping chemicals into the atmosphere >>>>>>> since the industrial revolution doesn't have any long-term effects. >>>>>> Hence your libtard party's solution of chemtrails dumping >>>>>> thousands of tons per year of chemicals into the atmosphere in an >>>>>> attempt at "global dimming". LOL >>>> <crickets> LOL >>>>>> Oh, stoooopid libtard didn't know about the libtard envirowhackos >>>>>> supporting that bit of insanity, did it? LOL >>>>>>> thanks for stepping up and letting everybody know that you're an >>>>>>> idiot. >>>>>> Projection on your own part and on the part of the party you >>>>>> support, the murderous thieving mentally-ill liberal Democrat >>>>>> party, the same party who started the 9/11 truther movement (an >>>>>> attempt at blaming Republicans for 9/11), slavery, Jim Crow, >>>>>> eugenics, institutionalized racism, forced sterilizations and >>>>>> inoculations that render women unable to bear children and which >>>>>> sickens and kills tens of thousands of kids worldwide (which is >>>>>> still going on today in many countries... paid for with US >>>>>> taxpayer money via USAID), and the Klimate Katastrophe Kook >>>>>> attempted environmental carbon exchange scam. LOL >>>>>> >>>>>> If you stoooopid fuckwits ever woke up to reality, your heads >>>>>> would collectively explode, and we'd have a couple grams of brain >>>>>> matter to clean up. LOL >>>> <crickets> LOL >>>>>>> ironic, given that you clearly appreciate science, you just seem to >>>>>>> have enough of a stake in conservative whackjob politics to >>>>>>> cherry-pick what you claim is the TRVTH. >>>>>> That you can't handle the truth that the earth will do just fine >>>>>> either with or without us, as it's done for billions of years, is >>>>>> noted, EnviroWhackJob. >>>>> it's ironic that you claim to understand science yet atmospheric >>>>> science eludes you. >>>> "Atmospheric science" like using a flawed computer climate model >>>> and falsified data to scream out kooky alarmist "zOMG! Globular >>>> Warmings!" while denying the raft of peer-reviewed proof such as >>>> ocean temperatures not changing one iota; Antarctica, Greenland >>>> and the Arctic glaciers adding ice at record levels; global >>>> temperatures decreasing for the past 15 years or so... yeah, you >>>> listen to the retards who have no understand of "atmospheric >>>> science", the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks in the IPCC. LOL >>>> >>>> =============================================================== >>>> <http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html> >>>> Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data. >>>> >>>> Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since >>>> ~1998. *Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been >>>> dropping for ~17 years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied >>>> to for ~17 years: >>>> <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF> >>>> >>>> Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com> >>>> Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in >>>> recent years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack >>>> Machine archived it): >>>> <http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html> >>>> Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... >>>> *falling* temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose. >>>> =============================================================== >>>> >>>> Note that the above uses data from the very agencies who are >>>> k'laming "zOMG! Globular Warmings!"... their underlying data >>>> proves otherwise. Global warming is nothing more than a >>>> politicized scam, an attempt by libtard politicians to get carbon >>>> exchanges set up, increase the cost of living for everyone by >>>> hundreds of billions of dollars per year while siphoning off >>>> profits of billions of dollars per year... selling a solution >>>> that does nothing to solve a problem that doesn't exist. >>>> >>>> Prove otherwise, KookTard. >>>> >>>> <snicker> <crickets> LOL! >>>>> it's cute that you can just wave your hand on alt.usenet.kooks and >>>>> ignore the sheer weight of all of the toxins, particulates, and waste >>>>> that our civilization dumps into the air and water. >>>> Is that why the libtards proposed dumping thousands of tons of >>>> toxins, particulates and waste directly into the upper atmosphere >>>> in a retarded attempt at global dimming, Hypocritical Dimmy? LOL >>>>> also, that part where you think there's some k0oky conspiracy >>>>> theory explaining why 97% of all climate scientists are >>>>> *certain* that climate change is currently predominately driven >>>>> by the effects of human activity, not sunspots, polarity flips, >>>>> or jebus. >>>> LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and stupid... >>>> they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass long enough >>>> to do their own research, and even if they could, that hard math >>>> eludes them. LOL >>>> >>>> Klimate Katastrophe Kook K'lame #4: 97% of climate experts agree >>>> humans are causing global warming >>>> >>>> SPNAK! #4 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> The "97% of climate scientists agree" is an outright lie: >>>> Message-ID: <c407c7d08fb6911ec5f4f90971e41c78@dizum.com> >>>> ========================================================= >>>> The LibTard environmental whackadoodles keep bleating about "97% >>>> of climate scientists agree that global warming is human >>>> caused!". >>>> >>>> Where did this 97% figure come from? >>>> >>>> When you explore its lineage, it turns out to be about as >>>> convincing as a Chicago election. The most prominent form of it >>>> comes from a professor in Australia named John Cook at the >>>> University of Queensland. >>>> >>>> What Cook's study purported to do was to review the abstracts >>>> (not the entire papers, just the abstracts) of 11,000 climate >>>> science articles. >>>> >>>> But when you read the first paragraph of Cook's abstract for his >>>> study, it says, "We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no >>>> position on anthropogenic global warming, 32.6% endorsed >>>> anthropogenic global warming, 0.7% rejected it, and 0.3% were >>>> uncertain." >>>> >>>> That means only 1/3 of those papers had an opinion on >>>> human-caused global warming. The next sentence in Cook's abstract >>>> for his study says, "Among abstracts expressing a position on >>>> human-caused global warming, 97.1% endorsed the consensus >>>> position that humans are causing the warming." >>>> >>>> 11000 * .326 = 3586 * .971 = 3482 >>>> (3482 / 11000) * 100 = 31.65% of climate scientists agree that >>>> global warming is human-caused. And those 31.65% aren't even all >>>> "climate scientists"... a good majority of them are research >>>> assistants and college students who write the (non-peer reviewed) >>>> papers that the lead researchers (mainly associated with the IPCC >>>> and other politicized "scientific" entities) put their names on. >>>> >>>> But then, LibTard environmental whackadoodles are gullible and >>>> stupid... they can't pull their heads out of liberalism's ass >>>> long enough to do their own research, and even if they could, >>>> that hard math eludes them. >>>> ========================================================= >>>> >>>> If poking holes in your kooky worldview is as simple as pointing >>>> out your conceptual and mathematical errors, your worldview is >>>> false. Take this to heart... your belief in a false worldview >>>> classifies you as delusional at best, most likely insane. >>>> >>>> <snicker> <crickets> LOL! >>>>> <points and laughs at you> >>>> He says, standing in front of a mirror and projecting. LOL >>>> >>>> The "zOMG! Globular Warmings!" scam is done. The lie has been >>>> exposed, no one believes the libtard bullshit anymore... not even >>>> the Klimate Katastrophe Kooks flogging the alarmist bullshit: >>>> >>>> =============================================================== >>>> Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails: >>>> <http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html> >>>> "I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both >>>> global warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real >>>> public relations problem for us." >>>> - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from scandal-rocked University >>>> of East Anglia, letting the cat completely out of the bag. >>>> =============================================================== >>>> >>>> Kook. >>>> >>>> <snicker> <crickets> LOL! >>> says kemtrailKook. >> You've already had your teeth kicked in about this, you've tucked >> tail, and ran away... thereby admitting you're a delusional >> fuckwit who didn't know the libtards have been talking about >> climate manipulation by spraying chemtrails to increase "global >> dimming" since 1996. >> >> Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com> >> >> SPNAK! on the delusional dildoriding bootfucked kooktard. >> >> <snicker> > dumbshit kemtrailKook says the gubbament is trying to reverse that global > warming thing that doesn't exist! Awww, is poor kook melting down and spewing lies now? Message-ID: <9f29b4c9531f669cfa3509755ff91f80@dizum.com> "I never said I believed in it, merely that members of your libtard collective have proposed it. Stoooopid. LOL" And that's why you're melting down... because your own libtard comrades have proposed chemtrail spraying (ie: dumping *more* pollutants into the upper atmosphere... because they're such fervent envirowhackos they want to save the earth by polluting it more LOL) for climate manipulation (to reverse the nonexistent global warming that the *libtards* delusionally believe in) from as far back as 1996, as I proved, spanking you and your denial of same until you started crying. :( You're not very bright, so you're not very good at this Usenet thing, Dimmy. <snicker> > BWAHAHAHAHA! Capslock froth and delusional manic laughter, noted. <snicker> -- Kensi snipped out any evidence that proved her wrong then demanded that evidence again and again, only to snip it out again; she denied having written what she clearly wrote (after she snipped it out, of course); she k'lamed that I'd written things I clearly didn't (and she failed to back up her k'lames with proof); she stated that zoanthropy and transexualism aren't mental illnesses (they are listed in the DSM); that the psychiatric community is incorrect for listing them as such by taking an example from nearly 100 years ago (hysteria), long before modern psychiatry got a grasp on what exactly constitutes a mental illness; she stated that the CDC is promulgating "FUD" that's "been debunked in thousands of places" (yet provided no proof of this k'lamed "debunking"); she's been cornered into admitting her belief that gays have suffered "no harm" in living a lifestyle that's given 19% of them AIDS, causes the gay community to account for 63% of new AIDS cases per year (per the CDC) and kills thousands of them per year; she stated that liberalism is growing when it's actually in decline (and stated that conservatism is dying when it's actually growing and has a nearly 2:1 advantage over liberalism), and she had the audacity to try to use the same exact study from Gallup that I'd used to prove her wrong in the first place (proving she's kooking out so badly she's lost her reading comprehension abilities); she stated the Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking faster than ever when they're growing (to the tune of 49 Gt/yr, when considering that land ice is slowly growing and sea ice is rapidly expanding, per Nasa's ICESat); she stated that global temperature is rising when it's been falling for more than a decade per the UK Met and NASA, and accounting for the revelations that US climate researchers outright falsified the data to give the impression that a 90 year cooling trend was actually a warming trend; she k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change, then quoted a web page that says the exact opposite (the same web page, BTW, that I'd used to prove that CO2 lags temperature change, proving yet again her loss of reading comprehension)... then she *admitted* CO2 lags global temperature change, thereby being forced to agree with me (and reality); she then k'lamed CO2 as the driver for global temperature change *again*, but as yet has been unable to explain, given that CO2 levels were 5 times higher in the Ordovician and sun output was nearly the same (0.991 Ordovician, 1 today), why we're not in a perpetual ice age today; she presented examples of mass-shooting suspects that she k'lamed were conservative (but they turned out to be liberal, socialist or were the result of a liberal upbringing); she tried to state that Nazism was a conservative political party (it's a form of liberal fascism that takes many of its tenets directly from socialism); she failed to provide any proof of some of her kooky contentions while k'laming them as "proof"; she used a flawed and biased dating website poll and k'lamed that it trumped an actual scientific study (ironic, given that she's a scientist herself); she melted down so badly she lost her ability to do simple math; she attempted to k'lame Abraham Lincoln was a liberal (he admitted he was a conservative); she attempted to k'lame that every major civil rights advancement was solely due to liberals (when it was conservatives who've advanced the overwhelming majority of civil rights bills, to the strident opposition of the liberals), she k'lamed she knows who I am due to her "kookology experience", "profound psychological insight" and "cryptanalysis skills", yet she's thus far run from five challenges to out me, for 395 days and counting (ie: she doesn't dare provide any of her so-called "proof", for fear that she outs the fact that she's kooking out and seeing me everywhere), and her loss of reading comprehension skills resulted in her apparent loss of being able to determine chronology. As the level of spankage she was receiving escalated, the time between her posts grew, and the length of her posts grew shorter as she snipped out more and more evidence that she's a delusional kook... she's been beating a strategic retreat for months now.... when she's not attention-whoring for all the boys because her make-believe husband isn't paying enough attention to her fat, ugly, delusional ass anymore. LOL
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 06:17 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 01:05 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 03:08 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 17:56 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 03:04 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 18:13 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-21 00:15 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 19:23 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 12:03 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:57 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-22 15:09 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 22:14 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-22 16:32 -0500
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 01:26 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-23 04:01 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 17:48 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-22 01:40 -0700
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 18:16 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-23 12:55 -0700
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 01:59 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.astronomy.fart-acceptance> - 2015-08-21 08:31 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming МалыШ <oppressed.welly-boot.top@melancholy.yum.yum> - 2015-08-22 07:00 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-21 20:53 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alabama.clay.colored.stools> - 2015-08-22 22:31 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 06:17 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Akhen-f-eshef" <two.bit.altar.of.love@floppy.penis.penitentiary> - 2015-08-23 08:19 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-22 19:44 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Jackson Fashshaw-Pofway" <cracked.up.cooze@creaky.peach.fish> - 2015-08-23 23:22 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 04:12 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Cedric Fenningstone-Chistway" <dried-up.peeper@incomplete.penis.penitentiary> - 2015-08-24 03:03 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 06:47 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.christnet.party-girls> - 2015-08-25 04:00 +0000
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 21:21 +0200
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 13:23 -0400
Re: New method could improve atmospheric forecasts over months, decades, and could explain 'pause' in global warming "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-20 18:41 -0400
csiph-web