Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #557099

Re: For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3-4 hours than efforts

Show all headers | View raw

well, Squally, there is more than one butterfly

> > simulations. Our results imply that minimizing initial errors on
> > scales around 100 km is more likely to extend the accuracy of
> > forecasts at lead times longer than 3-4 hours than efforts to
> > minimize initial errors on much smaller scales. These simulations
> > also demonstrate that squall lines, triggered in a horizontally
> > homogeneous environment with no initial background circulations, can
> > generate a background mesoscale kinetic energy spectrum roughly
> > similar to that observed in the atmosphere.
> >
> > Citations
> >
> > Thunderstorms Don't Get Butterflies by Dale R. Durran and Jonathan A.
> > Weyn published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,
> > doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00070.1
> 
> -- 
> 
> sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
> to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
> community, and physics-related social issues.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3–4 hours than efforts to minimize initial errors on much smaller scales Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:35 -0600
  Re: For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3–4 hours than efforts to minimize initial errors on much smaller scales jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-26 22:55 +0000
  Re: For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3-4 hours than efforts noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-26 16:52 -0800
    Re: For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3-4 hours than efforts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 13:05 -0800
      Re: For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3-4 hours than efforts noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 16:39 -0800
  Re: For weather forecasting, precise observations matter more than butterflies. Researchers find that minimizing initial errors on scales around 100km is more likely to extend the accuracy of forecasts at lead times longer than 3-4 hours than efforts "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-27 13:06 -0800

csiph-web