Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #60493

Re: most of all, i miss

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raper, socked up as Nadegda, 
in <news:nmh10s$e19$63@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into 
the wood chipper again:

> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:09:26 +0200, FNVWe wrote:

>> Remember when I had to school you on the Radiation Paradox, photon
>> generation (you k'lamed it was because of molecular movement (in a
>> solid, no less), not electron orbital descent. LOL!), the ~11-micron
>> infrared atmospheric window, and the fact that in Antarctica during
>> the wintertime, it's *dark* all the time, so solar insolation couldn't
>> be causing a temperature increase as you'd stupidly k'lamed? You
>> moron. LOL

> Don't tell me you *still* won't admit that the molecules in a solid 
> vibrate at any temperature above absolute zero.

Sure they vibrate, Paul. But molecules in a solid are not
"flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place" (Paul Derbyshire's words), nor
is heat "stirring up the molecules" (Paul Derbyshire's words), nor is
heat putting the molecules in a solid on a "somewhat different
trajectory" (Paul Derbyshire's words).

Nor does that vibration cause photon generation. Photons can only be
generated from atomic or molecular transitions, IOW, electrons
dropping in their orbitals. You stupid fuck.

> Even *I* know that, and kensi spanked you silly about that a
> few months ago.

Your left sock was SPNAK!d silly on that topic, and you ran away, 
Paul. But nice try at historical revisionism.

>> Kensi the moron wrote:
>> ================================
>> The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
>> the curvature is 4*pi
>> ================================

> Selective quoting won't help you, kook. The second "curvature" referred 
> to there was the integral of the Gaussian curvature over the surface of a 
> sphere, which is a quantity needed to apply the Gauss-Bonnet theorem 
> relating curvature to Euler characteristic.

Paul, you stupid fuck, your left sock specifically said the sphere's 
*Gaussian* curvature is 1/r^2, which is wrong. We weren't discussing 
any other curvature _but_ Gaussian. But your pathetic attempt at 
backpedaling in spite of the fact that your left sock was wrong is 
noted. LOL

>> The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent upon
>> that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

> Wikipedia says otherwise, kook. Larger spheres have smaller curvatures.

Not Gaussian curvature, you stupid fuck.

The Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = (4*pi), and 
therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is independent of r due 
to its symmetry. You stupid fuck.

> Fakey McKookTard thinks the Earth and a tennis ball have the same 
> curvature!

Here's the origin of your mistake, Paul:

Message-ID: <342eb30aba0dbc06663692a58ff2410c@dizum.com>
=========================================================
> Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one hand,
> the Gaussian curvature, which is defined at each point of
> a smooth manifold, and the integral of that curvature over
> the manifold, on the other. The latter, for closed and
> bounded manifolds like a sphere surface or torus (donut
> surface), is 2*pi*chi(M) where chi(M) is the Euler
> characteristic, and thus is 4*pi for a sphere (regardless
> of curvature or size)."

I just realize that LunkHead doesn't know what "integral" means. He
thinks an integral is a separate measure other than the Gaussian
curvature! Bwahahaaaaa! What a *moron*. He can't do simple geometry
problems, he's demonstrated repeatedly that he doesn't know how to
cancel identical terms in an equation, and now he's admitted he
doesn't even know what an integral is!

LunkHead wrote: "Here's a hint: you seem to be confusing, on the one
hand, the Gaussian curvature, which is defined at each point of a
smooth manifold, and the integral of that curvature over the manifold"

In mathematics, an integral assigns numbers to functions in a way that
can describe displacement, area, volume, and other concepts that arise
by combining infinitesimal data. So in effect, the integral of the
Gaussian curvature is merely the equation that describes that Gaussian
curvature, but LunkHead thinks it's separate, another measure of
curvature!

What a *moron*! He's SPNAK'd himself with his own stupidity yet again!

Bwahahahaaaa!
=========================================================

For a sphere, Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry.

<http://web.cs.iastate.edu/~cs577/handouts/gaussian-curvature.pdf>
"Thus a sphere of radius r has total Gaussian curvature 1/r^2 *
4*pi*r^2 = 4* pi, which is independent of the radius r."

<http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/gaussbonet.htm>
"For example, a sphere of radius R has a constant curvature of 1/R^2
so the integral of curvature over the surface of the sphere is the
constant curvature of 1/R^2 times the area of the sphere of 4*pi*R^2
which is equal to 4*pi."

> BWA<SMACKASHROOMTARD!>

Stop crying, Paul... you're a moron, you'd think by now you'd have 
gotten used to being one... you've had your whole life to do so. LOL

Let's pause for a moment and laugh at Paul Derbyshire for a while
longer, shall we?

==========================================================
Message-ID: <70a4c67b944148a7070d3fec0f3abc17@dizum.com>
"or that gravitation results from positive curvature of the spacetime
manifold?"

Bwahahahaa! Paul Derbyshire k'lames that gravity is a result of
*positive* Gaussian curvature of the Riemannian manifold. Thus, Paul
Derbyshire believes gravity *repels*. LOL

Message-ID: <5213102e7d795603ae437dcf79b2049c@dizum.com>
"In standard general relativity, it has *no* effects (save to cause a
small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in the
field)."

Bwahahahaaa! Paul G. Derbyshire k'lames that magnetism causes "*no*
effects", then backpedaled with a "save to cause a small amount of
positive curvature"... which means Derbyshire has no clue how
magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski manifold, and he denies magnetic
attraction. LOL!

Message-ID: <ee7e5d6b47fc9f9b3589e03d58af414a@dizum.com>
"Curvature varies from place to place, and in this universe is mostly
positive (small areas where it's negative can be produced via means
like the Casimir effect)."

Bwahahaa! Paul G. Derbyshire yet again k'lames the Gaussian curvature
of the universe is "mostly positive", meaning he thinks planets ride
above the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold,
thereby making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian
curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means 
Derbyshire believes the universe is not infinite nor expanding. 
Derbyshire also demonstrates that he has no fucking clue what the 
Casimir Effect is nor how it affects 4-D spacetime. LOL
==========================================================

Hey, where are you going, Paul G. Derbyshire? Are you going to run
away from your stupidity? Again? LOL

Paul Derbyshire, you stupid fuck, you've been outed seven times.
You're *still* using one of the IP addresses below, you moron.

03 May 2016 - MID: <ng9mdq$m43$33@dont-email.me>
posting-host="28e199bc366b04f624161a7e7c6d9ee6"
67.70.57.221 Deep River, ON, Canada

10 Jun 2016 - MID: <njf6m0$9i5$13@dont-email.me>
posting-host="5a7d8d855af84388d01b7dc826ef09d4"
67.70.57.173 Deep River, ON, Canada

20 Jun 2016 - MID: <nka7gl$lnq$1@dont-email.me>
posting-host="012e03f33b086ea5f85f61609ba7b360"
67.70.98.116 Deep River, ON, Canada

01 Jul 2016 - MID: <nl6kqc$q0d$10@dont-email.me>
posting-host="58c64c3df7194056193d4316e7d6bde7"
67.70.57.43 Deep River, ON, Canada

05 Jul 2016 - MID: <nlh8q3$sgh$12@dont-email.me>
posting-host="ffc2b295bc7bc97250a857d253111bde"
67.70.57.183 Deep River, ON, Canada

09 Jul 2016 - MID: <nlrmrj$lqb$15@dont-email.me>
posting-host="3eb94e9ccb87adec6bcfc39357241aba"
67.70.59.199 Deep River, ON, Canada

And once by Ray Banana. LOL

Anyone can check that the IP addresses have MD5 hashes that match your
posting-host, and anyone can go to MaxMind GeoIP to determine that
you're a dress-wearing goat-raping shroomtard using IP addresses from
Deep River, ON, Canada, just down the road from Pembroke, ON, Canada.

Now you k'lame that the IPv4 address space causes MD5 collisions...
you know you want to (here's a hint, moron... look at the number of
possible IPv6 addresses, and the number of possible MD5 hashes...
they're the same (2^128), hence no collisions even for IPv6.).

You moron. LOL

Nadegda got outed as that lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard Paul G.
Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada by Ray Banana. When Kensi D.
LunkHead learned of this, he immediately started backpedaling and
k'laming that "Nadegda" was actually just "vacationing" in Pembroke.
LOL!

Message-ID: <a76a23be8f4a22ea6c31dde5b3e2dd8c@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/alt.usenet.kooks/yhNtCQr1rpE/GlDtnrGgMxsJ>

From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Subject: Re: A REVIEW: How much does Keith "Murphy" McElroy suck at
this Usenet thing?
Message-ID: <km1mfl$t4j$7@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 00:58:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="67.70.58.178"; logging-data="29843";
Summary: Murphy is a kook with hundreds, if not thousands, of sock
puppets
Keywords: Murphy
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
========================================================
========================================================

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke, Ontario, Canada is a life-long virgin,
you see. He'll never touch anything more feminine than his hand with a
Barbie-doll wig glued to it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's
hooker-pink lipstick smeared between thumb and index finger knuckle.
Ironically, he's named his f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in
the sack... an expert in getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so
deeply it pokes out of her mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

Everyone is laughing at you, Paul Derbyshire. Everyone.

Spankard. ShroomTard. Failure.

<snicker>

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/carleton.chat.suggestions/XxE2PVnleGs>
Subject: The Derbyshire Saga
================================================================
[ Posted on Wed, 7 Feb 1996 18:39:04 GMT ]

Ok, kids... here's the voice from the cheap seats, on the Derbyshire
Saga (tm).

Now, having read about young Paul (the short, whiny, irritating,
psychotic child that he is) having been dragged from a lab by "the
man", I can only assume that this little story occurred a) yesterday,
and b) in the Steacie building.

The coincidence of two such occurrences cropping up in the same day
"here in the trailer park" would be just too far out to contemplate.

It would seem, then, that young Paul Derbyshire is taking first year
chemistry. As an aside, I'll note that this isn't his first little
"fling" with the department. Shortly before Christmas, the undergrads
had their lab techniques exam. Paul, to whom we can add "clumsy" as
one of his many ignoble traits, couldn't perform under pressure
(begging the question...). Long story short:  He flipped... lost it
completely. Started swearing first at the proctors, then at the lab
supervisor, and lastly, after having been ejected from the lab, lashed
out at the department Chair. (Oh, yes, cursing, swearing, threatening,
the whole nine yards.)

Btw, this goes partly to the issue of "why didn't the TA in question
squash Mr. Derbyshire like a bug?". Since the repercussions could've
been significant.

In any event:  Yesterday, Paul spilled something in the lab. He
refused to clean it up. (I believe his exact words were "I am not a
human mop.". He kept asking other students to clean up his mess, and
became obstinate when pushed to take care of it himself. When he
started screaming and ranting, the lab supervisor called security on
him.

The fellow who responded is a human mountain named Al. Really nice
guy. Anyway, Paul was standing at the sink with a corrosive solution
in a flask, and refused to leave. "I'm busy, can you come back when
I'm not so busy" is the purported comment he made. Al refused to
apprehend him until the chemicals were secured, so, with security and
the lab supervisor watching, Paul returned to his bench, and continued
his experiment. This involved clamping the offending flask, at which
time Al moved in for the kill (so to speak).

Paul struggled, and managed to punch Al in the face (knocking off his
hat!). Al became... vexed, shall we say, and grabbed Paul by the neck
in a sort of headlock. (If you can imagine tiny Paul hanging, feet
kicking, whilst Al lifts him from behind with one arm around the neck
you have the proper picture.) Al then removed him from the lab, put
him on the ground, and proceeded to cuff him.

(Paul:  "what are you doing!?")

Al calls for backup at some point.

Al: "540, this is 8, I need backup for a..." etc.

Paul:  "Talking in police code doesn't make you any better than me."

Note:  All Paul comments were in a Sam Kinison-like screech at this
point.

Campus security backup arrives, as to the "real cops". They mention to
Paul that he's going "downtown" where he will be their guest for "a
long time". As he is being dragged out of the building, Paul is
screaming "What do you mean 'a long time'? I have things to do
tonight!"

Well... sorry if my prose isn't the greatest.  The story is much
better with voice-over, and particularly when you know all the people
involved. (except Paul, of course). I heard it first hand from a guy
in my lab who witnessed the whole event, btw. He does great Sam
Kinison impersonations.

I hear Paul is now the proud owner of a "No Trespass" restraining
order to keep him from the premises of Carleton University.

Semper Inquirens  (thx, Corey)
================================================================

Brian Publicover wrote:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/carleton.chat.suggestions/XxE2PVnleGs/lS73j-DcD04J>
================================================================
I remember in grade 8 Paul once threw a chair at my head because I
suggested that he liked girls (he used to hate females when he was
younger). This was not an isolated incident: I've seen him attack many
people. I don't think he's dangerous (unless he is holding corrosive
chemicals), but I'd hardly call these incidents "bizarre quirks."
================================================================

Awww, poor bootfucked little kooktard Paul G. Derbyshire of Pembroke,
Ontario, Canada has to relive his horrible past all over again... on
top of having his stoooopid ass drop-kicked across Usenet each and
every day. LOL

And now he's been outed as a dude who likes wearing dresses. And 
raping goats. LOL!

-- 

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so 
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) said the Gaussian curvature = 
1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) says every sphere in the 
entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a 
moron, kensi didn't specify the units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent 
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the 
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you 
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore = 
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is 
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original 
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) persists in insisting 
that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of 
a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand 
the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference 
between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know 
what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even 
basic geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an 
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor 
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general 
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of 
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is 
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was 
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative 
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects 
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is 
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive 
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the 
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby 
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature, 
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes 
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has k'lamed that magnetism 
has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then 
backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature 
due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't 
know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and 
denies the existence of magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has described a 
universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe 
in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could 
not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature 
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and 
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody 
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow 
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming 
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of 
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron 
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain 
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien 
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron 
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the 
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed 
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven 
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of 
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral 
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how 
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer; 
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place", 
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on 
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead 
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that 
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared 
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate 
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a 
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second 
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same 
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that 
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three 
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a 
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's 
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that 
struggles (and fails) to understand reality. Kensi the moron is Paul 
G. Derbyshire.

<snicker>

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-18 00:09 +0200
  Re: most of all, i miss Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:31 +0000
    Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-21 16:25 +0200
      Re: most of all, i miss Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-23 23:08 +0000
        Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-24 06:47 +0200
          Re: most of all, i miss Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-24 20:59 +0000
            Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-25 05:34 +0200

csiph-web