Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.checkmate > #60192

Re: most of all, i miss

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Paul G. Derbyshire the dress-wearing goat-raper, socked up as Nadegda,
in <news:nmbh3p$e19$1@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into
the wood chipper again:

> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:16:17 -0400, Robert Michael Wolfe the
> Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop
> Jockey) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, socked up as
> sucksroot@127.0.0.1:

>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:52:29 -0400, Trailer Trash Tony
>> the Law-Breaking Scam-Running Drug-Dealing Woman-Beating
>> Child-Endangering Tax-Evading Unemployable Racist High-
>> School-Dropout Needle-Tracked Drug-Addled Alcoholic Pissbum
>> (aka Tony Ray Rawlings, aka Anton Ray Eaks of 600 Raintree
>> Blvd #58, Lamplighter Trailer Park, Canon City, CO), socked
>> up as Skeet DoW # 420 <Skeet@notinvalid.invalid> wrote:

>>> The door thing, if he is in California, then you caught him.
>>> I know the laws there

You only know how to break the law, Pissbum. You're New Emmett. LOL

>>> and your right.
>>> 
>>> Fakey has some splaning to do.
>>> 
>>> Well Fakey?   <waiting>

The explanation is that you're a bleaty retarded pissbum. LOL

<https://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/3235.html>
Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving:
(1) Any assembly building;
(2) Any hazardous area;
(3) An occupant load of 50 or more.

SPNAK! on Trailer Monkey Tony.

<snicker>

> <http://imgur.com/xt9bcTq>
> 
> I were a execyootive reegunal sailes man making deleverys.
> Now I are a toofless unemployalbe pissbum.

Maybe you should beg online for fake teeth again, Pissbum.

<snicker>

> I just found out today. Maybe a year. I love you all.
> My shits fucked up anyboby givs a damn?

No.

Lying Drug-Abusing Woman-Beating Trailer-Trash Pissbum Tony Ray Eaks.

<snicker>

>> let's see...
>> 
>> feefiefoefum?  SPNAK!1!!

You mean the true story that has you butthurt because you'd be so
intimidated in the same circumstance that you'd convert to Islam and
wear a burqa, DildoRider? LOL

>> backwards Lotus?  SPNAK!2!!

You flipped the photo to try to get it to fit with another photo,
because you're a photofuckering stalking moron. You got caught at it
and tried to lie your way out of it. LOL

>> speckled Lotus?  SPNAK!3!!

Same here. You tried to paste "speckles" into my photo to match
another photo, but you fucked up the angle and the size. LOL

I'll also note you tried to color-correct my photo to match the photo
you randomly picked off the internet, and got caught at that, too. LOL

>> 120/240 split-phase?  SPNAK!4!!

Says the moron who k'lamed you were feeding 240 V 3-phase to the
_primary_ of a substation transformer, getting 208 and 120 volts off
the _primary_, and feeding that to a 208 volt AC service. LOL

>> 3-phase delta?  SPNAK!5!!

I proved you're a mathematical mega-moron who doesn't know how to use
the Euler Sinewave Summation equation, so you used a sinewave
subtraction equation which gave you results such as the combining of
all three phases of 3-phase AC (akin to shorting the three phases
together) gives *double* the phase-to-ground voltage, and it inverted
the phases, forcing you to use negative phase angles to correct your
fuckup, and it *still* gave you the wrong results. LOL

>> 2550.25?  SPNAK!6!!

Shiny Tinfoil Spankard proved you wrong on that, DildoRider. Keep
backpedaling. LOL

>> gableFables?  SPNAK!7!!

Says the moron who *still* doesn't know what a gable is, and was so
perturbed he ran around taking photos of the front and top of his
porch to prove it. LOL

>> knocked on your door?  SPNAK!8!!

You were caught in your "multi-camera security system hooked up to a
15 year old craputer protecting the porch of your shitshack
half-a-house" lie after you got so perturbed you took a photo of the
*front* of your porch. LOL

>> Peak vs RMS?  SPNAK!9!!

I knew what peak, peak-to-peak and RMS voltage was, you dolt. Shiny
Tinfoil Spankard didn't. He confused peak and peak-to-peak first, I
schooled him, then he confused peak and RMS, you jumped into the fray
and I schooled you both... remember, you're the halfwits who
"mathematically proved" that RMS voltage is always DC. LOL

>> Derivatives?  SPNAK!10!!

Again, I'm the one who schooled you morons on mathematical
derivatives, given that I use them all the time in stock trading
indicators. Shiny Tinfoil Spankard confused mathematical derivatives
used in stock trading indicators with the asset-based contract called
a derivative, you jumped into the fray, and I schooled both you
furrow-browed dolts. LOL

>> Closed race track?  SPNAK!11!!

I proved the track was open that day, that only the drag track had
been closed prior to that (and only to NHRA-sanctioned events that
featured the 5000+ HP funny cars that were the source of the noise
that caused the complaint in the first place), and that the parties in
the lawsuit had reached an agreement months before I raced to allow
racing as long as sound restrictions were met. LOL

>> Memorial Day weekend centrifuge rides?  SPNAK!12!!

DildoRider believes the military takes days off... yet he's not gone
to the website to determine that they were open that day. LOL

> Sylow subgroups of the isometry group of the cube?  SPNAK!13!!

You've been spanked on this topic twice already, Paul.

The group Rot(cube) of all rotations of a cube acts transitively on
the six faces of the cube and the 8 vertices. There are 4 rotations of
the cube that keeps a given face fixed. This is why the chiral
symmetry order is 24, and also why there are 8 Sylow p-subgroups,
Paul. The Sylow p-subgroups are cyclic subgroups... a face or a vertex
and its opposite have the same stabilizer.

Your left sock kensi k'lamed there were 16 Sylow p-subgroups, then
backpedaled and k'lamed there were 12 Sylow p-subgroups, and
specifically that one of them is trivial. Then you fucked up on basic
math (again) and ran away from the topic after I proved you wrong.
Then you tried to divert attention away from your fuckup by blathering
something about ULVZs. LOL

If you hadn't been trespassed from college for physically attacking
people like the creeper that you are, perhaps you'd have learned a
thing or two, Paul, you moron. LOL

> Climate change denial?  SPNAK!14!!

You've been SPNAK!d several times on that topic, Paul... each time you
ran away from your libtard Klimate Katastrophe Kook alarmist bleating.

A handful of examples of you being utterly decimated by reality:
Message-ID: <2d9a20d4fd20e7926b5f1b05bd8dcc16@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <dbd0f401b53e480956183d920a1b4775@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <4be75413c35c904ab8b65347bfa48683@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <bdfcec1d87a2e63f2fe85a149f54ff68@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <56103df3825bffb6c895b8c19160cb42@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <9c29696a847d41278412e6ffc610195c@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <572517e97e47e36efbb5e7b33e5e4f6f@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <6262f56f6e8f920d6990dbb3a93aa149@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <bfaf1cde67558d4678703738e0a59217@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <6d3569e0c3204c1e6c4059686f4329e6@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <7219e0077283e68eac58167081ece67d@dizum.com>
Message-ID: <818bae314342fb4abbf610db8f135db1@dizum.com>

Remember when I had to school you on the Radiation Paradox, photon
generation (you k'lamed it was because of molecular movement (in a
solid, no less), not electron orbital descent. LOL!), the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, and the fact that in Antarctica during
the wintertime, it's *dark* all the time, so solar insolation couldn't
be causing a temperature increase as you'd stupidly k'lamed? You
moron. LOL

The satellite data shows a *cooling* trend, Paul, you stupid fuck.
Remember? That's what you got SPNAK!d for in the past, and you ran
away from it...

Message-ID: <bdfcec1d87a2e63f2fe85a149f54ff68@dizum.com>
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Why can't you refute the unmanipulated satellite temperature data,
LunkHead? Why do you keep running from it? It's peer-reviewed data, 
unmanipulated, unadjusted, from prestigious institutions of 
research... and it proves you Klimate Katastrophe Kooks *wrong*. LOL!

<http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/06/26/study-that-warned-of-global-warming-over-past-decade-ridiculed-after-temperatures-drop/>
The UK Met trend shows an accelerating -0.014 C per decade *decrease*.

Message-ID: <e46a4017e5a77519d1489cd3f1129c08@dizum.com>
The actual underlying (read: unmanipulated) NOAA data shows a 0.6186 F
*decrease* from 2005 to 2015.

<http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783>
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI>
Dr. Don Easterbrook shows the past global warming was solar and
orbital forcing induced, the conditions have changed, and global
cooling has set in... since 1998.

<http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-pause-hits-18-years-on-rss-data.html>
Using UK Met, UAH and RSS data.

Page 11 - Global temperature rate (C per year): dropping since ~1998.
*Negative* since ~2005. That means temps have been dropping for ~17
years, and the gullible LibTarDs have been lied to for ~17 years:
<http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/media/pdf/e/f/Paper1_Observing_changes_in_the_climate_system.PDF>

Message-ID: <b41f4a8054430ac46092e607919d7063@dizum.com>
Even NASA admitted that global temperatures were falling in recent
years (before they pulled that page... luckily the WayBack Machine
archived it):
<http://web.archive.org/web/20030816225534/http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/methane/greenhouse.html>
Note the center trace for modern times in that graphic... *falling*
temperature, even as CO2 and methane rose.

"There has been no warming since '98, and a very slight cooling that
is not statistically significant." - Phil Jones

<http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html>
"We have been building models and there are now robust 
contradictions," says Liu, a professor in the UW-Madison Center for 
Climatic Research. "Data from observation says global cooling. The 
physical model says it has to be warming."

===============================================================
Taken from the hacked ClimateGate 1.0 and ClimateGate 2.0 emails:
<http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2012/01/email-4141-glimpse-into-climate-science.html>

"I think the notion of telling the public to prepare for both global
warming and an ice age at the same time creates a real public
relations problem for us."  - Asher Minns, "climate scientist" from
scandal-rocked University of East Anglia, letting the cat completely
out of the bag.

You'll note he doesn't say "global cooling", he specifically says "an
ice age"... that's telling, don't you think? LOL
===============================================================
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Now Paul Derbyshire will get so butthurt all over again that he'll be
forced to spam hundreds of thousands of butthurt bleats to Usenet.
Again.

<snicker>

> K'lames Hitler was a leftist?  SPNAK!15!!

Message-ID: <ec850d6d3e675f7401cc89ba85435bd2@dizum.com>
===============================================================
Hitler admitted he was a socialist, as did Goebbels. It's in their 
party's name "National Socialist German Workers Party", you moron. LOL

Fascism was borne directly out of a schism in the Italian socialist 
political party, making it left of center, you fucking moron. We've 
gone over all this already, I've already provided ample proof to slap 
your yammering gob shut on a couple of occasions, yet you being the 
retard that you are, you keep slobbering and drooling out the same 
retarded stupidity. Evidence below.

Message-ID: <c62edd1677a9c3f180ff90803251ad1f@dizum.com>
===================================================================

The liberals were the ones who voted Hitler into power, and the ones
who voted Hitler defacto dictatorial powers.

On top of that, the fascist policies Hitler adopted after he'd been
granted defacto dictatorial powers were modeled on the fasci of Italy,
which were a result of a schism in the Italian Socialist Party.

Fascism as practiced by Hitler was a direct descendant from socialism
as practiced in Italy.

Hitler didn't outlaw socialism because he hated it, but because he
viewed it as corrupt, and felt his brand of national socialism was
"the answer". It wasn't on ideological grounds that Hitler banned
traditional socialism, but merely as means of implementing his own
brand of socialism.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism>
==========================================================
At the outbreak of World War I in August 1914, the Italian political
_left_ became severely split over its position on the war. The Italian
_Socialist_ Party (PSI) opposed the war but a number of Italian
revolutionary syndicalists supported war against Germany and
Austria-Hungary on the grounds that their reactionary regimes had to
be defeated to ensure the success of _socialism_.[90] Angelo Oliviero
Olivetti formed a pro-interventionist fascio called the _Fasci_ of
International Action in October 1914.[90] The term "_Fascism_" was
first used in 1915 by members of Mussolini's movement, the Fasci of
Revolutionary Action.

Similar political ideas arose in Germany after the outbreak of the
war. German sociologist Johann Plenge spoke of the rise of a "National
Socialism" in Germany...
==========================================================

> K'lames Gaussian curvature of a sphere is not 1/r^2?  SPNAK!16!!

Paul Derbyshire k'lames all spheres have the same radius. LOL

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) said the Gaussian curvature =
1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) says every sphere in the
entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a
moron, kensi didn't specify the units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) persists in insisting
that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of
a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand
the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference
between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know
what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even
basic geometry problems.

SPNAK! on three kooktards. I've been right about everything, the
morons are found yet again to be 180 degrees out from reality.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) said the Gaussian curvature =
1 / r^2 *and* the Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) says every sphere in the
entire universe has a radius of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a
moron, kensi didn't specify the units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) persists in insisting
that what he wrote isn't fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of
a sphere *does* depend upon its radius, because he doesn't understand
the equations he's trying to use, he doesn't know the difference
between 'constant curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know
what an integral is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even
basic geometry problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*. It also means LunkHead believes
the universe to be finite, and therefore it cannot be expanding.

Lunkhead the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has k'lamed that magnetism
has "*no* effect" upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then
backpedaled and said there was a "small amount of positive curvature
due to the energy density in the field", thereby proving he doesn't
know how magnetism affects the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and
denies the existence of magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron (aka Paul G. Derbyshire) has described a
universe in which planets could not maintain their orbits, a universe
in which magnets could not work, and therefore a universe which could
not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi attempted to back up his kooky k'lame above by further k'laming
that snow emits at wavelengths which correspond to a variety of
temperatures, presumably from 489 F to -422 F, because the moron
doesn't understand that the Planck curve breaks down under certain
circumstances, meaning snow emits in accordance with the Wien
Displacement Law in a ~2.1251 micron window centered on the ~11-micron
infrared atmospheric window, not Planck's curve.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lamed heat flows from cooler to warmer;
that in a solid, molecules are "flying-and-bouncing-around-the-place",
that heat is "stirring up the molecules" and putting the molecules on
a "somewhat different trajectory", thereby demonstrating that LunkHead
cannot even grasp such basic topics as what heat is.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy shroomtard loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality. Kensi the moron is Paul
G. Derbyshire.

<snicker>

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-18 00:09 +0200
  Re: most of all, i miss Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-17 22:31 +0000
    Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-21 16:25 +0200
      Re: most of all, i miss Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-23 23:08 +0000
        Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-24 06:47 +0200
          Re: most of all, i miss Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-07-24 20:59 +0000
            Re: most of all, i miss "Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-07-25 05:34 +0200

csiph-web