Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #710535
| Subject | Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| References | <FvGBD.126514$8Q.102081@fx36.am4> <3d1a3929-b152-4a0c-bff6-e31e0c8f347b@googlegroups.com> |
| From | Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <3mkCD.231558$kh6.11183@fx32.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2018-10-31 16:02 +0000 |
On 31/10/2018 04:18, Steve wrote: > On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 2:55:14 AM UTC+10:30, Keith Stein wrote: >> Summary: >> 1. The speed of light in intergalactic-space is slowing down. >> 2. There was no "Big Bang" >> 3. There was no "Inflation" >> 4. The galaxies are not accelerating away from us. >> 5. There is no "Dark Energy" >> >> >> Searching for an alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts, >> >> keith stein > > Hi Keith > > You'll have learned more for having questioned and tested conventional doctrine, and having sort alternative explanations, benefit from having viewed it from contrasted perspectives. Those who dont engage in this fashion, but rather except conventional theory as teacher prescribes it without having rationalized for themselves, they dont come to know the subjects in quite the same way. And I say this irrespective of whether the theories taught are correct or not. The road you are on can lead to a far superior education. > > Having tried to break conventional theory and failed, one can have learnt a great deal. Or perhaps one tries to break conventional theory and succeeds. Even better. But this is a lonely road, for 98% of people dont have the mindset of questioning doctrine, and you can expect their disagreement by default. But you will know this already Thank you Steve,I appreciate that. I am old enough to remember the time before the Big Bang :) , and was always skeptical, and increasingly so as i witnessed the attempts to rescue the already preposterous cosmology with the ever more preposterous notions of "inflation" ,"dark matter", and their latest creation "dark energy". I don't doubt that in the long run the "Big Bang" will be considered as little better than the notion that the Universe rides on the back of a turtle, or was it a tortoise ? In the meantime, yes it is a lonely road, but i really don't mind the 'flames'. Not nearly so bad as the 'flames' Giordando Bruno suffered eh! keith stein
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 16:25 +0000
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-29 20:34 +0100
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 22:00 +0000
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-05 09:52 -0600
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 14:33 -0500
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-05 13:38 -0800
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Steve <steve7600@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:03 -0800
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 12:54 -0700
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-29 14:16 -0700
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-29 22:19 +0000
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-10-29 15:57 -0700
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 16:20 +0000
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-10-30 18:48 +0100
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 18:10 -0800
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Steve <steve7600@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 18:54 -0800
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 14:28 -0800
Einstein snubbed the Nobel committee. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-05 19:01 -0800
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Steve <steve7600@gmail.com> - 2018-10-30 21:18 -0700
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 16:02 +0000
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 12:58 -0400
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Steve <steve7600@gmail.com> - 2018-10-31 19:34 -0700
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-01 14:27 -0700
Re: Alternative explanation of the Hubble Red Shifts Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:36 +0000
csiph-web