Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.food.fast-food > #40801

Re: This is a switch!

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Bite My Shiny Metal Ass, in
<news:213rcblfik2rj8i5knr5n9r39ac8abmodg@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
first into the wood chipper again:

> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus
> <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka 
>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), 
>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>> <news:op.ydbmk7dztm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>> into the wood chipper again:

>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:27:28 -0500, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

>>>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:42:47 +0800, Bite My Shiny Metal Ass wrote:

>>>>> FNVWe stomped the brain of a retard. Again:

>>>>>> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the Coin-Slot
>>>>>> Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate The PickleTickler), in
>>>>>> <news:MPG.31352f5a644eab7098c866@news.altopia.com> did thusly jump head
>>>>>> first into the wood chipper again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fakey's in a big pickle, and usually it's the other way around.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Oh gawd!  How am I going to get out of this?  It's too late to admit
>>>>>>> I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about.  There's GOT to be a
>>>>>>> way... some sort of bluff... or a diversion!  I simply CAN'T let
>>>>>>> anybody think that there's ANYTHING in the whole wide world that I'm
>>>>>>> not an authority on.  Damn... if dad was here, he whip my ass good
>>>>>>> for not being perfect in every way.  I've GOT to bluff my way outta
>>>>>>> this before it gets any worse!  I didn't even see this coming.  How
>>>>>>> was I to know that that shiny metal dogwhistle guy... oh, wait...
>>>>>>> that's TWO different people who fucking blindsided me with actual
>>>>>>> electrical engineering knowledge, and then there's Kensi... FUCK!
>>>>>>> That's THREE people!  I thought she was supposed to be a fucking
>>>>>>> astrophysisist-global warming ko0k, not a fucking math wizard!  I
>>>>>>> know!  What if I posted that ASCII picture of a man's gaping asshole
>>>>>>> and balls, and claimed it was a vagina again? Shit... now I've got
>>>>>>> Snipe and Lamey demanding custom faglames from me... like I really
>>>>>>> have TIME for all this extra work!  Damn... I wish I hadn't gotten on
>>>>>>> Paul's bad side... I need some time to romp with his frisky goats.
>>>>>>> FUCK!  FUCK!  FUCK!"

>>>>>> Translation:
>>>>>> "FNVWe kicked my stoooopid ass and proved I'm a bleatfarting faggot and
>>>>>> bad electrician. Now that he's proven the Euler sinewave addition
>>>>>> equation is the defacto equation to use and destroyed DildoRider's
>>>>>> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, which I defended several times, I
>>>>>> look like an even bigger moron. And now that FNVWe has utterly
>>>>>> destroyed Ko0O0oki kensi by proving LunkHead was so stupid he didn't
>>>>>> even know about the radiation paradox or that CO2 is a global *cooling*
>>>>>> gas as NASA proved (I stuck up for kensi's stupidity because I really
>>>>>> want to get into a *third* "hawt wet 69" with Paul Derbyshire), I
>>>>>> *really* look like a fucking idiot. So watch me
>>>>>> BBBBBBBBBLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTT!!!!"

>>>>> Aaaand, Checky scores a direct hit!
>>>>>
>>>>> whrreeeeeeeeeeeeyoooooowwwwKABLAAAAMMMOO! <froth, spittle & fakeypieces
>>>>> flying everywhere>

>> Translation:
>> "Aaaand Chimpy gets the toe-end of FNVWe's steel-toed boot 
>> dead-center!"
>> 
>> How pathetic are you that your definition of "winning" is "someone 
>> paid attention to me, no matter that they're drop-kicking my retarded 
>> ass across Usenet"?

> You said it, fakey.

I'm doing it.

<drop-kicks retard>

<snicker>

>>>> At this point, he has to be reverse-trolling.  There are now two items
>>>> that he continues to deny with a tremendous Gish Gallup.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Grade school word problem.  Voltage is a DIFFERENCE in potentials.
>>>> How do we find the difference?  Through the arithmetic operation
>>>> of __________.

>> You just answered your first question with your second, and likely 
>> didn't even realize it. Here's a hint... if you add a positive vector 
>> and a negative vector, what do you get?

> Can you explain without froth what a "negative vector" is?

Didn't they ever teach you this in your speshul klasses, Moron? LOL

<http://www.everythingmaths.co.za/science/grade-10/20-vectors-and-scalars/20-vectors-and-scalars-03.cnxmlplus>
===========================================================
Just like scalars which can have positive or negative values, vectors
can also be positive or negative. A negative vector is a vector which
points in the direction opposite to the reference positive direction.
===========================================================

Yet again, Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates that he doesn't know shit
about shit.

<snicker>

>>> did you notice how he won't share his graphed functions?  he must have  
>>> learned something when he tried to SUM them on a graph.  you're welcome,  
>>> fakey!

>> Yeah, I did. It's called the Euler sinewave summation equation. It's
>> only been in use since the 1800s. I'm sure you can find it on
>> Google... oh, wait... you're a moron. LOL

> Lol.

Maybe it's starting to sink in for DildoRider just *how* wrong he's
been ever since he started blathering out his stupidity about
subtracting vectors. LOL!

>>>> 2) Trigonometric identity.  sin(x+pi) = -sin(x).

>> Well no shit. 2*pi = 1 full cycle, 1*pi = one half cycle. Thus the 
>> vectors are opposite at x and x+pi. Do you not understand Euler's 
>> sinewave summation equation?
>> 
>> <snicker>

>>> he's still rough on this one.

You're still projecting your lack of knowledge of how the Euler
sinewave summation works, DildoRider. Because you're a mathematical
moron.

<snicker>

>>>>> --
>>>>> "The 120.208 volt RMS L-N sinewaves peak at 120.208 volts,
>>>>> moron. LOL"
>>>>>   --fakey claims RMS and peak voltage are identically equal

>> Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames that 120.208 volts RMS L-N isn't the RMS 
>> voltage of 170 volts, and he yet again demonstrates that he doesn't 
>> understand the terminology. LOL!

> Nope, you claim that.  After i explained it to you.

You're the moron who keeps bleating about 120.208 volts RMS being a
"peak voltage", Moron.

>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square#RMS_of_common_waveforms
>>>>
>>>> Am I wrong in thinking the RMS for a 120V sine wave would be 84.85V?

>> 120 volts is the RMS of 170 volts. Moron.

>>> he just fucked up completely there.

>> Wrong.

> Why can't you graph 120v RMS, fakey?

I did.

> Why can't you admit it peaks at 169.7v?

I do, in fact, I graphed it, too.

Shiny Tinfoil Brain didn't even know the Euler equation is a subset of
equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is
a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given
that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*); that cross
correlation is used with Fourier transforms; that superposition is the
same as wave interference; that wave interference works the same for
standing or traveling waves; that RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two
different things; that 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase
service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L; what a positive or negative
vector is; and the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to
read a graph.

Aren't you the moron who's already demonstrated his inability to
distinguish between peak-to-peak and RMS when you blathered that the
graph I'd posted was actually a graph of 85 volt RMS?

Shiny Tinfoil Brain wrote:
<MID:rdomcb169mq5csebugqrbj9ganol8je5s1@4ax.com>
"You graphed sines with 85v RMS and 147v RMS amplitude."

Yeah, you *are* the moron who demonstrated that you don't know the
difference between RMS and peak-to-peak. No idea where you're getting
147 volts, maybe you're just a moron.

SPNAK!

> Why can't you admit you are wrong?

Because I'm right, and you're a moron.

> Is your brain reeling from excess of spankitude?

Well, I *have* been spanking the living fuck out of you retards
lately, but reeling? Nah... chuckling.

<chuckle>

> -- 
> "...a sinewave is a Fourier transformation of a circle."
>   --Fakey

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor>
<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Unfasor.gif>

Message-ID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com>
=========================================================
<http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-interactive-guide-to-the-fourier-transform/>
See the animations about 1/4th down the page? Yeah, those are Fourier
transforms transforming circles to sine waves in real time... and in
the process smearing egg on your stoooopid face. LOL

<http://muller.research.engineering.cornell.edu/sites/WEELS/summer06/Fourier%20Transforms-2D.pdf>
2D Fourier transform of a circularly symmetric function translates to 
Bessinc shape in 2-D, translates in 1-D to a sinewave.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform>
"Still further generalization is possible to functions on groups, 
which, besides the original Fourier transform on R or R" (viewed as 
groups under addition), notably includes the discrete-time Fourier 
transform (DTFT, group = Z), the discrete Fourier transform (DFT, 
group = Z mod N) and the Fourier series or *circular* *Fourier* 
*transform* (group = S^1, the unit circle ~ closed finite interval 
with endpoints identified). The latter is routinely employed to handle 
periodic functions."

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_function>
You know, periodic functions... like sinewaves.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"In mathematics, the Fourier sine and cosine transforms are forms of 
the Fourier integral transform that do not use complex numbers."

Gee.. that *Fourier* *sine* *transform* sure looks familiar, doesn't 
it?

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sine_and_cosine_transforms>
"Relation with complex exponentials:
The form of the Fourier transform used more often today is... Euler's 
Formula"

Why, that's the exact equation I used to properly graph 170 volt peak 
3-phase, which translates to 120.208 volt RMS L-N and 208.207 volt RMS 
L-L. I guess that's why they're called the Euler-Fourier Formulas.

<http://i.imgur.com/NrZzxlb.png>

SPNAK!
=========================================================

Aren't you the *moron* who k'lamed that Fourier transforms had nothing
to do with the Euler sinewave summation equation? Yeah... yeah you
are.

Spankard. Moron. LOL

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to alt.food.fast-food | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

This is a switch! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 14:45 -0800
  Re: This is a switch! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 16:40 -0700
  Re: This is a switch! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 18:13 -0800
    Re: This is a switch! Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 19:18 -0700
      Re: This is a switch! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-22 19:30 -0800
  Re: This is a switch! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-23 14:20 -0500
    Re: This is a switch! "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-23 12:05 -0800
  Re: This is a switch! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 03:42 +0800
    Re: This is a switch! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-24 00:27 +0000
      Re: This is a switch! "B00py Gurl" <B00py@gurl.yep> - 2016-02-23 22:48 -0600
      Re: This is a switch! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-23 23:54 -0500
        Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 07:57 +0100
          Re: This is a switch! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 19:04 +0800
            Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-24 20:44 +0100
              Re: This is a switch! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 03:05 +0800
                Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 07:13 +0100
          Re: This is a switch! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 04:13 -0500
            Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100
              Re: This is a switch! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-25 12:56 -0500
                Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 06:10 +0100
                Re: This is a switch! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-26 14:23 +0800
                Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-26 19:45 +0100
                Re: This is a switch! "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-26 15:27 -0500
                Re: This is a switch! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-27 06:31 +0100
      Re: This is a switch! Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-24 13:48 +0800

csiph-web